In its typical, inimitable fashion, the New York Times has once
again significantly mislead the public. This time in regard to Trump’s tax
avoidance. However, in this case, they apply the same very procedures whenever
needed by themselves.
To set the background, the opening line of the “Tax Preparer Resume
Objective,” @livecareer.com’s website says: “Just as taxpayers trust
you to ensure they aren’t audited by the IRS and that they pay as few taxes as
legally possible, hiring managers trust you to be able to adequately show you’re
qualified for a position as a tax preparer.” A confirmation that just about
every citizen earning income desires minimization of financial obligations and
expenditures as legally possible.
As a statistical matter, according to Catey Hill, Editor @marketwatch.com:
“An estimated 45.3% of American households — roughly 77.5 million
— will pay no federal individual income tax, according to data for the 2015 tax
year from the Tax Policy Center, a nonpartisan Washington-based research group.
(Note that this does not necessarily mean they won’t owe their states income
tax.)
“Roughly half pay no federal income tax because they have no taxable income,
and the other roughly half get enough tax breaks to erase their tax liability,
explains Roberton Williams, a senior fellow at the Tax Policy Center.
“On average, those in the bottom 40% of the income spectrum end up getting
money from the government.
Therefore, since about 25% of citizens pay no taxes because they get enough
tax breaks to erase their tax liability,” Trump’s by no means alone in his
desire to maximize whatever he can from his occupational efforts.
As far as the general public’s attitude toward taxes is concerned, assuring
lawful compliance has become an enormous enterprise. An article from The Tax
Preparation Industry website notes that: “Tax preparation is BIG business –
there were 300k people employed at 109k firms in 2012 - generating $9 billion in
revenue in 2012. The industry grew over 2% from 2010-2015, and is expected to
speed up the pace of growth. Revenues of $11 billion are forecast for 2018. Tax
preparation is unusual in that it provides a service to assist with a process
that legally every American is required to do: submit an income tax return.
Because it is required, tax preparation tends to be recession resistant.”
It’s also a very sure bet that all that hard-earned money wasn't spent by
employed Americans to insure that they gave every dollar possible to the
IRS.
And then, in an article in which Chris Christie dismissed Trump’s tax status
as unimportant, the Trump campaign correctly noted that the issue involves
perfectly legal handling of his personal taxes. It then added: “Mr. Trump
is a highly-skilled businessman who has a fiduciary responsibility to his
business, his family and his employees to pay no more tax than legally
required," the statement went on. "That being said, Mr. Trump has paid hundreds
of millions of dollars in property taxes, sales and excise taxes, real estate
taxes, city taxes, state taxes, employee taxes and federal taxes, along with
very substantial charitable contributions."
All of which serves to underline that before selectively picking issues with
which to attempt vilifying those it despises, sources such as the New York
Times ought to do at least a modicum of homework to avoid
self-embarrassment.
Especially because, the Times itself is perfectly happy to legally
minimize the amount of money it pays to the government. According to Jeffrey
Dorfman @forbes.com: “More recently, for tax year 2014, The New
York Times paid no taxes and got an income tax refund of $3.5 million even
though they had a pre-tax profit of $29.9 million in 2014. In other words, their
post-tax profit was higher than their pre-tax profit. The explanation in their
2014 annual report is, “The effective tax rate for 2014 was favorably affected
by approximately $21.1 million for the reversal of reserves for uncertain tax
positions due to the lapse of applicable statutes of limitations.” If you don’t
think it took fancy accountants and tax lawyers to make that happen, read the
statement again.”
Which for Trump, equates to the perfect squelch.
Moving along, a FB friend posted this one today:
Which brings us to today’s update on Bill Clinton’s wife, who apparently agrees wholeheartedly with Trump on taxes, regardless of her public attempts to discredit him.
Tyler Durden @zerohedge.com titled his article today: “Clinton
Campaign Admits Hillary Used Same Tax Avoidance "Scheme" As Trump”
Mr. Durden quotes Bill's wife as saying that Trump "apparently got to avoid
paying taxes for nearly two decades—while tens of millions of working families
paid theirs."
“However, a look back at Hillary Clinton's tax returns from 2015 (here),
proudly displayed by the campaign proving she has nothing to hide - shows
something awkward on page 17...
“While not on the scale of Trump's business "operating loss", Hillary Clinton - like many 'wealthy' individuals is taking advantage of a legal scheme to use historical losses to avoid paying current taxes.
“As Bloomberg notes, this federal tax break is among the wealthy's most used
avoidance schemes...”
What’s also interesting is that while Bill’s wife focuses on “millions of
working families” that paid their taxes, how many of those families lost $909
million like Trump? She herself lost a mere $699,540 and wrote it off just like
he did.
So, once again we have continuing evidence of misquotes, inaccuracy's and
constant double-standards from Bill’s wife and a complicit MSM. Bringing up the
ongoing question once more: Bernie Sanders, Joe Biden, Jerry Brown, and
Starbucks chairman and CEO, Howard Schultz; are you guys reading this?
That's it for today folks.
Adios
No comments:
Post a Comment