BloggeRhythms

Much of today’s news is quite repetitive, providing deeper detail on familiar story’s regarding the presidential candidates. However, what’s abundantly clear is unquestionable major media bias against Republicans at every level, which now seems to include even Fox.

Yet, regardless of media efforts to shade the truth, primarily with focus on polls they claim to be unbiased, consistent evidence of Trump’s viability continues nonetheless.  

Todays USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times "Daybreak" poll shows Trump ahead 44.1% to 43.9%, while rasmussenreports.com, has both candidates in a virtual tie “at 42% support among Likely U.S. Voters.” 

According to Rasmussen: “Trump’s performance in the second debate improved his fortunes after the release of a devastating 11-year-old video that showed him making graphic sexual comments about women. Clinton in turn has been battling revelations from WikiLeaks’ release of hundreds of internal campaign e-mails and is now facing new questions about her handling of classified information while secretary of State.” 

Thus, in this case, the candidate comparison seems infantile by any rational standard. On Trump’s part he’s been accused of debasing women in a decade old guy’s locker room bragging session which he thought was between a couple of pals. Harming no one in the process. His opponent, on the other hand, has been found to be guilty of mishandling classified information at the nation’s highest levels at the very least.     

Which leads right into  a quite different, but absolutely logical indication of where the presidential race truly stands at the moment.

According to James Moore @independent.co.uk via Drudge, wagering in Britain now suggests a similar pattern to the very surprising Brexit vote.

Mr. Moore headlined his story: “Punters rush to back Trump despite disastrous week of campaigning. [Bookmaker] William Hill slashes odds on Trump victory amid betting patterns eerily reminiscent of those seen in the lead up to the EU referendum.” 

The text says: “It is news that will strike fear into the hearts of perhaps half of America and large chunks of the world outside of it.  

“Despite a calamitous week of campaigning, betting markets on the US election are almost a mirror image of those on Britain’s EU referendum at this stage. And they could be pointing to a victory for Donald Trump. 

“Bookmaker William Hill says 71 per cent of the money so far staked is for Democrat Hillary Clinton. But 65 per cent of the bets by number are for the controversial Republican. 

“That means a lot more punters are putting smaller bets on Trump, almost exactly the same pattern as was seen in the run up to the Brexit vote when the money was for Remain but the majority of bets were for Leave. 

“The bookie has cut the odds on a Trump victory from 11-2 to 4-1 over the past two days in response to a surge in bets for the reality TV star and businessman turned politician.” 

And it seems that those wagering on Trump are not alone in their preference for him, as indicated by none other than the POTUS, who in 2008 delivered his opinion of Trump's opponent, posted by a Facebook friend this morning.  

Which brings us to today’s update on Bill Clinton’s wife that adds fuel to the POTUS’s premise that she, and those around her, have no compunctions whatsoever about abusing the public’s trust, or anyone else’s. However, he too may fit the very same description.

Peter Hasson, Reporter and Associate Editor @dailycaller.com, informs us that: “A key operative in a Democratic scheme to send agitators to cause unrest at Donald Trump’s rallies has visited the White House 342 times since 2009, White House records show.

“Robert Creamer, who acted as a middle man between the Clinton campaign, the Democratic National Committee and “protesters” who tried — and succeeded — to provoke violence at Trump rallies met with President Obama 47 times, according to White House records. Creamer’s last visit was in June 2016. 

“Hidden camera video from activist James O’Keefe showed Creamer bragging that his role within the Clinton campaign was to oversee the work of Americans United for Change, a non-profit organization that sent activists to Trump rallies. 

“Scott Foval, the national field director for Americans United for Change, explained how the scheme works. 

“The [Clinton] campaign pays DNC, DNC pays Democracy Partners, Democracy Partners pays the Foval Group, The Foval Group goes and executes the s***,” Foval told an undercover journalist. 

“Creamer’s job was to “manage” the work carried out by Foval.” 

Creamer told an undercover journalist: “And the Democratic Party apparatus and the people from the campaign, the Clinton campaign and my role with the campaign, is to manage all that.” 

“Wherever Trump and Pence are gonna be we have events,” he said. 

So, here’s further evidence of underhanded, unethical political tactics of the lowest form possible that can be added to the WikiLeaks and FBI disclosures. It also serves to indicate why Trump is still quite viable in credible presidential polls as negativity mounts toward his competitor. 

And it also raises the continuing question again: Bernie Sanders, Joe Biden, Jerry Brown, and Starbucks chairman and CEO, Howard Schultz, are you guys are reading this?  

  

That's it for today folks.       

Adios