What’s most newsworthy about today is that, with the exception of repetitive
articles about the state of the upcoming election, there isn’t much of anything
else at all.
As far as the election’s concerned, the mainstream media’s already given the
victory to Trump’s opponent, treating him as a loser who’s merely finding ways
to save face as he licks his wounds.
At the same time, however, November 8th is still 15 days away and there are
those who insist that the news of Trump’s loss are totally inaccurate.
Paul Joseph Watson @infowars.com, writes about political science
professor Helmut Norpoth, who has accurately called the results of the last five
presidential elections, and “still asserts that Donald Trump has an 87% chance
of defeating Hillary Clinton despite Clinton being ahead in the polls.”
The professor said: “It usually turns out that the candidate who does better
in his party’s primary beats the other guy who does less well,” adding that
“Trump’s margin of victory in New Hampshire and South Carolina compared to
Clinton (who lost in New Hampshire) was crucial to his model.”
The campaign strategy being applied was identified in a confidential memo allegedly
obtained from Correct The Record, a Democratic Super PAC. The revealed plan
involves the “barraging” of voters with high frequency polls that show Hillary
ahead in order to “declare election over,” while avoiding any mention of the
Brexit vote (which completely contradicted polls that said Brexit would fail).”
At the same time, “emails revealed by Wikileaks show how Democratic
operatives planned to encourage “oversamples for polling” in order to “maximize
what we get out of our media polling.” In other words, sample more Democrats
than Republicans in order to make people believe that Hillary’s lead is far
greater than the reality of a tight race.”
“Norpoth’s forecast of a Trump victory mirrors what’s taking place in the
betting markets, with British bookmakers William Hill revealing last week that
65% of all bets on the market have backed Trump to win the election, a similar
phenomenon to what happened before the Brexit vote, where the polls were proven
completely wrong.”
In addition, despite mainstream media efforts to support Democrats polling
distortions wholeheartedly, there is also other conflicting data available as well.
Rasmussen’s new national telephone and online survey of Likely U.S.
Voters today shows Trump with 43% support to Clinton’s 41%. Libertarian
candidate Gary Johnson gets five percent (5%) of the vote, while Green Party
nominee picks up three percent (3%). Another three percent (3%) like some other
candidate, while five percent (5%) are not sure.
“In the latest survey, 88% of voters say they are now certain how they will
vote, and among these voters, Trump holds a statistically insignificant 48% to
47% lead. Johnson has three percent (3%) support, Stein two percent (2%). Among
the voters who still could change their minds between now and Election Day,
Trump has the most to potentially lose: He’s ahead of Clinton 34% to 26% among
these voters, with Johnson at 25% and Stein at 15%.”
And then, the generally most reliable IBD/TIPP Tracking poll shows the two
leading candidates tied today, followed by Johnson at 8% and Stein at 4%.
All of which illustrates that the race is presently far from over no matter
how many misleading articles the mainstream media puts into print.
Bringing us quickly to today’s update on Bill Clinton’s wife, this one
from FoxNews.com, as follows:
“A top Clinton ally’s political organization reportedly gave nearly a
half-million dollars to the campaign of the wife of an FBI official who would go
on to help oversee the probe into Hillary Clinton’s email practices – a tangled
web likely to fuel Republican complaints about the investigation.
“The Wall Street Journal reported Sunday night on the connection. According
to the Journal, finance records show Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe’s PAC gave
$467,500 to Dr. Jill McCabe’s 2015 state Senate campaign. The Virginia
Democratic Party spent an additional $207,788 on the campaign, the Journal
reported.
“McCabe, who ended up losing to Republican incumbent Dick Black, is married
to Andrew McCabe – the FBI’s deputy director.
“At the time of the campaign and of McAuliffe’s support, McCabe was associate
deputy director. He later was promoted to deputy after the campaign ended,
assuming an oversight role in the Clinton email investigation.
“According to the same report, the PAC and Virginia Democratic Party money
amounted to more than a third of Dr. McCabe’s campaign funds. She also
reportedly was the third-largest recipient of the governor’s Common Good VA
funds.”
Thus, here again, whether it’s email disclosures or other forms of gaining
intelligence, two factor’s are undisputedly evident. Bill’s wife’s conduct is
always questionable and money’s always a root element.
Adding impact to this current probe is that: “The revelations in the Wall
Street Journal report could dovetail with Donald Trump’s persistent claims that
the Justice Department and FBI investigation into Clinton’s email use was
compromised. Trump repeatedly has complained about Attorney General Loretta
Lynch meeting with Bill Clinton on a Phoenix tarmac days before the FBI
announced no charges in its Clinton investigation.”
Thus here again, one has to wonder why it is that Democrats continually
support one so obviously corrupt. It certainly can’t be because of her
dedication the their cause, whereas in her own words she describes how she tells
supporters what they wish to hear with no intention of deliverance.
It neither can be her personality which ranges from abrasive to vile to
total despicability. And it can’t be her warmth or humanity, since they simply
don’t exist.
Nor can it be her policy’s under which every voter, and the nation
itself, suffers.
So then, what is it?
Perhaps other Democrats know, which leads to the ongoing question once again:
Bernie Sanders, Joe Biden, Jerry Brown, and Starbucks chairman and CEO, Howard
Schultz, are you guys are reading this?
That's it for today folks.
Adios
No comments:
Post a Comment