BloggeRhythms

As election day draws nearer, Rush, as usual, delivered a salient point on Facebook this morning regarding the ultimate credibility of pollsters.

Rush wrote: “We're getting close now to the period of time where the pollsters are going to have to start showing the race as it is. Now, I'm of the opinion they're not yet. I'm of the opinion that they're still using their polls to make news, to shape public opinion, rather than reflect it. As we get closer to the election, all of these polling companies are gonna want to be right when it's all over. So the polls that we get a week prior, the last polls before the election from all of these different outfits probably will be closer to what they really think is gonna happen, and because they have their reputations to protect after the election is over.”

As far as the polls themselves are concerned, the race is far tighter than the mainstream media wishes their audience to believe.

rasmussenreports.com reports that right now the presidential race nationally is about as tight as it can be. 

“Rasmussen Reports’ latest White House Watch survey finds Hillary Clinton with 42% support among Likely U.S. Voters and Donald Trump with 41%. Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson picks up seven percent (7%), while Green Party nominee Jill Stein again has two percent (2%) of the vote, 

“Eighty-five percent (85%) of voters say they are now sure how they are going to vote, and among these voters, Clinton and Trump are dead even at 47% apiece.”

The USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times "Daybreak" poll, shows Trump ahead at 44.9%, with his opponent at  43.3% a far cry from what the leftist press expected.

In that regard, much of the reason for Trump’s positive performance derives from the continual disclosure of certainly unethical and probably illegal actions by his rival currently surfacing on a daily basis. 

As reported on FoxNews.com today: “Republicans pressured the State Department on Monday to remove Undersecretary for Management Patrick Kennedy after newly released FBI records showed he offered a "quid pro quo" with federal authorities during the Hillary Clinton email probe.

“Documents revealed claims that Kennedy tried to horse-trade with the FBI, offering additional slots for the bureau overseas if they would de-classify a particular email from Clinton’s server marked “SECRET.” The files also revealed he repeatedly tried to “influence” the bureau’s decision when his offer was denied, even taking his plea up the chain of command. The allegation of a "quid pro quo" was first reported by Fox News on Saturday.”"  

At a campaign rally in Wisconsin, Trump said that the new revelation was worse than Watergate, and that: “This is one of the great miscarriages of justice in the history of our country.” 

State Department spokesman Mark Toner said Kennedy isn’t going anywhere. He also denied there was any proposed deal, saying the FBI official first raised the number of bureau personnel approved to be in Iraq as a separate issue. Which is a typical response from the current administration, who when caught red-handed continues to deny incontrovertible evidence. 

Bringing us to today’s update on Bill Clinton’s wife and the increasing probability of a revolt within the FBI by agents greatly disturbed by Director Comey’s whitewash of her criminality.

Kerry Picket @dailycaller.com, writes: “FBI agents say the bureau is alarmed over Director James Comey deciding not to suggest that the Justice Department prosecute Hillary Clinton over her mishandling of classified information.

“According to an interview transcript given to The Daily Caller, provided by an intermediary who spoke to two federal agents with the bureau last Friday, agents are frustrated by Comey’s leadership.” 

An FBI special agent who has worked public corruption and criminal cases said: “This is a textbook case where a grand jury should have convened but was not. That is appalling. We talk about it in the office and don’t know how Comey can keep going.” 

Surprised that the bureau did not bother to search Clinton’s house during the investigation, the agent said: “We didn’t search their house. We always search the house. The search should not just have been for private electronics, which contained classified material, but even for printouts of such material.”  

Another festering problem revealed by a special agent for the bureau that worked counter-terrorism and criminal cases, is that he is offended by Comey’s saying: “we” and “I’ve been an investigator. 

“Comey’s career moved through the U.S. Attorney’s Office until he became Deputy Attorney General during the George W. Bush administration. 

“After Bush left office, Comey entered the private sector and became general counsel and Senior Vice President for Lockheed Martin, among other private sector posts. President Barack Obama appointed him to FBI director in 2013 replacing out going-director Robert Mueller.” 

Therefore, the second agent said: “Comey was never an investigator or special agent. The special agents are trained investigators and they are insulted that Comey included them in ‘collective we’ statements in his testimony to imply that the SAs agreed that there was nothing there to prosecute. All the trained investigators agree that there is a lot to prosecuted but he stood in the way.” 

“The idea that [the Clinton/e-mail case] didn’t go to a grand jury is ridiculous.” 

As a result, Washington D.C. attorney Joe DiGenova told WMAL radio’s Drive at Five last week, “People are starting to talk. They’re calling their former friends outside the bureau asking for help. We were asked to provide legal representation to people inside the bureau and agreed to do so and to former agents who want to come forward and talk. Comey thought this was going to go away.” 

He explained, “It’s not. People inside the bureau are furious. They are embarrassed. They feel like they are being led by a hack but more than that that they think he’s a crook. They think he’s fundamentally dishonest. They have no confidence in him. The bureau inside right now is a mess.” 

He added, “The most important thing of all is that the agents have decided that they are going to talk.” 

Thus, what’s critical here is how quickly any potential revolt by disgruntled agents takes place. With the election only a few short weeks away it’s highly unlikely any legal ramifications will occur. However, the voting public is still getting the very clear indication of Bill’s wife’s illegal behavior. 

Which means, when added to all of the other evidence of her incriminating acts, the ongoing question must be asked again: Bernie Sanders, Joe Biden, Jerry Brown, and Starbucks chairman and CEO, Howard Schultz, are you guys are reading this?    

That's it for today folks.      

Adios