BloggeRhythms

The holiday season doesn’t seem to be turning out very merry for the administration. In fact, it might do them some good if they ask Santa to bring them a way to keep Fox News, and many Internet sources, from presenting the truth about them.

Today, FoxNews.com reports that: “Under changes in the newly signed spending bill, people from those countries who have traveled to Iran, Iraq, Syria and Sudan in the past five years must now obtain visas to enter the U.S.” 

As a result, top Tehran officials “complained the changes violate the terms of the nuclear deal, which says the U.S. and other world powers will refrain from any policy intended to adversely affect normalization of trade and economic relations with Iran.” 

In reply to Iran, Secretary of State, John Kerry, “suggested in a letter to his Iranian counterpart that the administration could help the country get around new visa restrictions passed by Congress.”

House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Ed Royce, R-Calif., reacted in a statement to FoxNews.com: “Instead of bending over backwards to try to placate the Iranian regime, the White House needs to be holding it accountable for its recent missile tests, its continued support for terrorism, and its wrongful imprisonment of Americans.” 

What’s truly remarkable about the situation, is that Iran has clearly indicated it has no real intention of living up to the meaningless nuclear agreement the POTUS and Kerry have concocted. Yet, those two, and Valerie Jarrett have spent most of their time trying to avoid having to deal with the U.S. Congress and the majority of the voting public, who are firmly against the deal.

However, today’s revelation regarding Kerry’s actions to aid Iran is another significant step toward insuring that a Republican will win the presidency next November. No matter which one of them wins the party’s nomination     

And then, adding to Democrat's woes, a week after the Paris climate summit ended, Jon Austin @express.co.uk, authored an article today, titled:“Climate change shock: Burning fossil fuels 'COOLS planet', says NASA”

Now that the summit’s over, and billions have been allocated to preventing global-warming, Mr. Austin reports that: “Major theories about what causes temperatures to rise have been thrown into doubt after NASA found the Earth has cooled in areas of heavy industrialization where more trees have been lost and more fossil fuel burning takes place.”

“Environmentalists have long argued the burning of fossil fuels in power stations and for other uses is responsible for global warming and predicted temperature increases because of the high levels of carbon dioxide produced - which causes the global greenhouse effect. 

“However, aerosols which are also given off by burning fossil fuels, actually cool the local environment, at least temporarily.” 

Obviously, NASA waited until after the POTUS’s climate scheme was applied in Paris to announce: “The research was carried out to see if current climate change models for calculating future temperatures were taking into account all factors and were accurate. As a result, a NASA spokesman said, "To quantify climate change, researchers need to know the Transient Climate Response (TCR) and Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity (ECS) of Earth.” 

Which means that at present, even NASA admits they haven’t enough information  to make an informed decision on global-warming at all, or if it really does damage.

Reader, WilberSmedley, summed the situation up precisely, writing: “In other words: They still don't have freaking clue about anything.” 

Which brings us to today’s update on Bill Clinton’s wife.

An item on FoxNews.com regards Charles Krauthammer telling viewers Monday on "Special Report with Bret Baier" that “Hillary Clinton should be a little more careful when discussing videos she alleges are radicalizing jihadists.  

“It wasn’t only a lie but a particular lie on the part of Hillary,” Krauthammer said, “Given her history, she ought to be a little bit careful about talking about incendiary American videos that are radicalizing jihadists.”  

“Alluding to the Obama administration's bungled attempts to blame an attack on the US consulate in Benghazi because of a video, Krauthammer pointed out that Clinton's video strategy is “not working” and "she ought to quit at two."  

As far as lying in general is concerned, the public seems to believe she has little to no credibility at all, regardless of the subject she’s addressing. According to the Wall Street Journal: “In a Wall Street Journal/NBC News October poll, Mrs. Clinton was rated poorly for being “honest and straightforward,’’ with 50% of registered voters giving her low marks, including 40% who gave her the lowest possible rating.” 

And that’s based on her current campaigning, which doesn’t cover the past that included the Whitewater scheme, the questionable overnight futures trading income, Vince Foster’s untimely demise, the missing IRS files, flying into Bosnia under sniper fire untruths, being named after Edmund Hillary who didn’t become world-famous until six years after she was born, and the Travelgate scandal. To name just a few that will be surely be pursued by her Republican opponent as the presidential campaign heats up in the future. 

Bringing up the continuing question: Joe Biden, Mayor Bloomberg, Jerry Brown, and Starbuck’s chairman and CEO, Howard Schultz, are you guys reading this?  

 

That's it for today folks. 

Adios