BloggeRhythms

As the pathetic old-liners in the Republican party continue licking their wounds, the Dem’s are seemingly preparing themselves to deliver Trump another gift.

News reports from the Wall Street Journal, and others, now say that Bill Clinton’s wife campaign is considering making Elizabeth Warren her running mate, while ruling out Bernie Sanders. And, if that’s true, adding another two-faced phony to the Dem ticket would make a Republican win in November almost a shoo-in. Even without the cry baby’s like Romney, the Bush’s and half-in, half out Ryan’s support.

However, if the wimpy, whiny fogies in the Republican hierarchy decide to wake up and give the party supporters a real chance by getting into the battle behind Trump, the Republicans might very well win the White House by the biggest margin in American history. 

On another favorite subject, it seems that other Republican lawmakers are finally stepping up to what’s been a one-sided campaign against the global-warming fraud that’s now called “climate change." That's because the “warming” has never taken place, won’t, and thanks to the polar vortex, can't.

Valerie Richardson @washingtontimes.com on Thursday wrote: “If Democratic attorneys general can pursue climate change skeptics for fraud, then also at risk of prosecution are climate alarmists whose predictions of global doom have failed to materialize.

“The “cuts both ways” argument was among those raised by 13 Republican attorneys general in a letter urging their Democratic counterparts to stop using their law enforcement power against fossil fuel companies and others that challenge the climate change catastrophe narrative.” 

In a letter this week, state prosecutors made the point that in accordance with free-speech: “If it is possible to minimize the risks of climate change, then the same goes for exaggeration. If minimization is fraud, exaggeration is fraud.” 

“Actions indicating that one side of the climate debate should fear prosecution chills free speech in violation of a formerly bipartisan First Amendment consensus,” said the Republicans. 

In addition to Alabama Attorney Luther Strange, “those signing the letter were Attorneys General Ken Paxton of Texas, Bill Schuette of Michigan, Craig Richards of Alaska, Doug Peterson of Nebraska, Adam Laxalt of Nevada, Mark Brnovich of Arizona, Sean Reyes of Utah, Leslie Rutledge of Arkansas, Scott Pruitt of Oklahoma, Brad Schimel of Wisconsin, Jeff Landry of Louisiana and Alan Wilson of South Carolina.” 

Which means, if the attorney’s general continue along the lines they’ve now created, where global-warming exaggeration is unlawful, AlGore and the POTUS may both be facing incarceration. Perhaps in adjoining cells. And if prisons wind up co-ed, just like the POTUS’s bathrooms around the nation, it’s quite possible Bill Clinton’s wife will also join them in the same slammer. A perfect trifecta.

Bringing us to today’s update on Bill Clinton’s wife.

According to Michael Sainato @observer.com: ”Hillary Clinton didn’t win the Democratic primaries through democratic means.” 

This situation is a double-whammy, whereas it exposes both computer-hacking as well as collusion on the part of Democrats, which should boost Trump as the information becomes sorted out. Provided that he can figure out how to use the windfall that’s now been handed to him.

Mr. Sainato writes: “Earlier this week, a lone hacker—self-dubbed Guccifer 2.0—breached DNC servers and reportedly obtained opposition research on the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, Donald Trump. The DNC confirmed the hack and hasn’t denied the authenticity of the documents released. The Party has, however, continued to propagate that the hack was deployed by the Russian government—perhaps because the information that was released is far more revealing than just opposition research. 

“Internal memos, dated May 2015—long before the first state voted in the Democratic primary—referred to Hillary Clinton as though she was already the Democratic presidential nominee. The documents leaked by Guccifer 2.0 not only illuminate the DNC’s efforts to ensure Clinton’s coronation but also reveal the strategies used to shield her from criticism on ethics, transparency and campaign finance reform—all vulnerabilities for the corrupt Establishment darling.” 

In Mr. Sainato’s next paragraph he mixes hyperbole with personal feelings to make his point, which is somewhat over the top, yet still is accurate regarding his conclusions, as follows:

  

“Despite being under criminal investigation by the FBI and DOJ, Clinton has still managed to secure the Democratic presidential nomination. And, despite revelations from the State Department Inspector General—who reported Clinton did break federal rules, effectively debunking the defense she has echoed for over a year—Democrats still, shockingly, continued to vote for her in the remaining primary states.” 

Mr. Sainato's personalization notwithstanding, what’s apparent here is that although in a different  setting and different context, the revelations establish that not only can computers containing highly classified information be breached, Guccifer 2.0 has clearly done it. Thus, by successfully completing his hacking attempt, Guccifer 2.0 has proven that Bill’s wife’s home-grown server was not only quite venerable, it too may have been breached without those hackers coming forward to acknowledge their accomplishments.  

And perhaps, that’s what Director Comey and the FBI have discovered about Bill’s wife’s server, which still remains to be seen by the public. It also brings up the daily recurring question: Bringing up the continuing question once more: Joe Biden, Jerry Brown, and Starbucks chairman and CEO, Howard Schultz, are you guys reading this?  

 

That’s it for today folks.         

Adios