Britain’s Brexit vote took many by complete surprise. Primarily
because the major media was completely unaware, or purposely misleading,
about voter sentiment throughout most of that nation. The same held true
for the majority of Parliament, up to and including Prime Minister
David Cameron, who’s now resigned because he was unable, or unwilling, to
grasp the sentiment of the majority of his people.
The preceding
is noteworthy today, because this same Brexit vote more than likely
offers a clear prediction of what will take place in the U.S. when
voters go to the polls this coming November. And that's because both
nations run parallel as far as key voter sentiment is concerned. The
majority's upset about lack of jobs, extremely high unemployment rates,
loss of national identity to globalization , and particularly, unbridled
illegal immigration.
In specific regard to the media, however,
two articles today illustrate clearly how particular bias and promotion
of a self-serving agenda frequently misleads the public in
general.
Gary Langer @abcnews.go.com, headlined his article yesterday: “Clinton
Opens 12-Point Lead on Trump as Two-Thirds See Him as Biased (POLL)”
Langer
went on: “Hillary Clinton surged to a broad advantage against Donald
Trump in the latest ABC News/Washington Post poll, capitalizing on
Trump’s recent campaign missteps. Two-thirds of Americans see him as
biased against groups such as women, minorities or Muslims, and a new
high, 64 percent, call Trump unqualified to serve as president.
“These
and other doubts about Trump have produced a sharp 14-point swing in
preferences among registered voters, from +2 points for Trump in
mid-May, after he clinched the GOP nomination, to +12 points for Clinton
now, 51-39 percent. That snaps the race essentially back to where it
was in March.”
Then, on the very same day, Anthony Salvanto @cbsnews.com, posted a column titled: “Poll: Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton in tight races in battleground states”
According
to Mr. Salvanto: “Battleground states are called battlegrounds for a
reason: They're often close, and 2016 looks like no exception.”
The
text says: “Hillary Clinton holds narrow leads over Donald Trump across
a number of key states of Florida (up three points, 44 to 41 percent);
Colorado (Clinton 40 percent, Trump 39 percent); Wisconsin (Clinton up
41 percent to 36 percent) and North Carolina, which has flipped back and
forth between the parties in the last two elections, where it's Clinton
44 percent and Trump 42 percent.”
So, two major media outlet's
present two completely different polls resulting in two completely
different conclusions. One shows Trump being eclipsed, the other having in
him almost a virtual tie at this point.
All of which goes to
illustrate that the presidential race’s outcome is total unknown at
present. And, if the Brexit vote is the indicator that many believe it
truly is, when November finally rolls around the actual vote results
will likely be the complete reverse of what the major media is trying to
sell to their shrinking base of readers at present.
On another
subject, the economy, one needn’t be a sophisticated financial analyst
to grasp the horrendous cost to the nation caused by misguided
environmentalist ideology and inane rhetoric. Because, here we are as a
nation in the midst of self-inflicted economic stagnation and buried in
debt caused specifically by political pandering and an anti-business
mentality at the top of the Democrat party.
Proof of the premise can be found in an article by Scott Mayerowitz, AP Business Writer @ap.org, who headed his column today: “Heading out of town: Independence Day travel to break record“
According
to Mr. Mayerowitz: “A record 43 million Americans are expected to
travel this Independence Day weekend, with the overwhelming majority
driving, according to AAA, a car lobbying group and one of the nation's
largest travel agencies. This tops the joint record set last year and in
2007.
“Lower gas prices, strong consumer confidence and a
generally healthy domestic economy have led more families to take trips
this summer.
“AAA estimates that U.S. drivers have saved $20
billion on gasoline so far this year compared to the same period last
year. Gas prices as of June 20 were 46 cents per gallon below prices
from a year ago.
"We are well on our way for 2016 to be a
record-breaking year for summertime travel," said AAA President and CEO
Marshall Doney.”
Interestingly, until last year when gas prices
began tumbling, thanks to fracking, the travel and business drought
coincide precisely to the period during which Obama presided
over the U.S. Which means that had he not pandered to environmentalist
drivel, the chances re the nation;s economy would have been amidst a
major recovery by now, while the huge national debt would likely have
shrunk considerably.
It also means that whatever safeguards
these same lunatic environmentalists wished to see in place would not
only have been affordable, they’d have plenty of money and time to
simultaneously search for alternative sources of fuel and energy.
However, liberal logic never extends that far. Because their immediate
reaction is always to kill the goose, whether or not there’s a viable
solution to the incredible level of damage they invariably cause due to
unearned self-importance and world class absences of basic knowledge.
And then, a friend sent this one:
Bringing us to today’s update on Bill Clinton’s wife.
In
his dogged personal effort to interpret and promote his ceaseless
discovering's of Bill’s wife’s offenses, Judge Andrew Napolitano @foxnews.com, this morning dropped another bombshell, as follows:
“The
discovery of a potentially damning email that Hillary Clinton failed to
turn over to the State Department is of "critical importance."
“On
"Mornings With Maria," Judge Napolitano explained that the email was
from top Clinton aide Huma Abedin to the then-secretary of state and her
inner circle, saying that they had been hacked and they were
temporarily disabling State Department security features to accommodate
Clinton’s private server.”
The judge said this directly
contradicts Bill’s wife’s repeated claims that she never jeopardized
national security secrets and that her emails were never hacked. Adding
that: “U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan suspected that Clinton
was not being forthcoming in releasing all her work-related emails, so
he had her swear "under penalty of perjury" that she had surrendered all
her governmental emails to the State Department.
"That is a code phrase for 'I think you're lying to me,'" the judge explained.
Equally
important, he said "that if the Justice Department declines to indict
Clinton for political reasons, many FBI investigators and Justice
Department prosecutors could rebel and leak details of the
investigation.
"If FBI agents resign and leak on the eve of the
election or the eve of the DNC, does President Obama have a
Watergate-like, Saturday Night Massacre on his hands?"
“The
"Saturday Night Massacre" refers to Richard Nixon's 1973 firing of a
special prosecutor and the resignation of his attorney general during
the Watergate scandal.”
Thus, this is the lingering issue
continuing to smolder just outside Bill’s wife’s current presidential
campaign. It’s uncertain conclusion may also very may be the reason that
Sander’s hasn’t conceded to her as yet. Because, if she’s indicted or
otherwise damaged by FBI detail leakage, someone will certainly have to
replace her as a candidate. A position Sanders certainly qualifies for,
considering his primary election performance.
It also calls for
the asking of the continuing question once more: Joe Biden, Jerry Brown,
and Starbucks chairman and CEO, Howard Schultz, are you guys reading
this?
That’s it for today folks.
Adios
No comments:
Post a Comment