With only three days to go until PEOTUS-elect Trump's inauguration, unhinged
Democrats provide mounting proofs of why they were so soundly defeated at the
polls nationwide. And that’s primarily because they have absolutely nothing to
offer voters except negativism, unfounded fear and massive distortions of the
truth.
Illustrations of panic are seen in the decision by more than three dozen
Democratic members of the House to boycott Trump's inauguration, isolating
themselves as selfishly uncooperative from the start.
Further child-like immaturity is found in an article by Steve Watson
@infowars.com, headed: “Desperate: Democrat Calls For Trump
Impeachment, Claims Russia Fed Him The Term ‘Crooked Hillary”
According to Mr. Watson, “California Congresswoman Maxine Waters was egged on
by MSNBC anchor Chris Matthews to explain why Trump’s presidency is "not
legitimate.”
Waters went on to call for Trump “to be impeached on the grounds that he
coined the term ‘crooked Hillary’ in collusion with the Russian government, even
suggesting that the Kremlin was feeding Trump such lines to use during his
campaign.
“If we discover that Donald Trump or his advocates played a role to help
provide strategy — if they’re the ones who came up with ‘Crooked Hillary,’ if
they’re the ones who came up with, ‘she’s ill, something’s wrong with her
energy,’ and the way that he basically described her during the campaign — I
think that is something that would put the question squarely on the table
whether or not he should be impeached.”
In closing she “went as far as to suggest that the nicknames Trump used
against all his political opponents, even Republicans, were fed to him by
Russia.”
At the same time, despite Ms Waters unfounded rant, concrete evidence of
shrinking leftist appeal among the populace can be seen in reports such as one
by Valerie Richardson @washingtontimes.com, this morning:
“Donald Trump may have a point about paid protesters: Job ads running in more
than 20 cities offer $2,500 per month for agitators to demonstrate at this
week’s presidential inauguration events.
“Demand Protest, a San Francisco company that bills itself as the “largest
private grassroots support organization in the United States,” posted identical
ads Jan. 12 in multiple cities on Backpage.com seeking “operatives.”
“Get paid fighting against Trump!” says the ad.”
The job offers a monthly retainer of $2,500 plus “our standard per-event pay
of $50/hr, as long as you participate in at least 6 events a year,” as well as
health, vision and dental insurance for full-time operatives.
However, while these groups of agitators are paid for their support in
protesting Trump, others are assessing him in a drastically different, far more
realistic light.
FoxNews reported today, that “the International Monetary Fund said
the U.S. would grow faster than expected thanks to President-elect Donald
Trump’s plans to cut taxes and increase spending on infrastructure.”
Reuters reported the agency said gross domestic product will go up
to 2.3 percent in 2017, and to 2.5 percent in 2018, while Maurice Obstfeld, the
IMF’s chief economist and a former adviser to President Obama said: “We think
the prospects of a more expansionary fiscal stance coupled with tax reform
justifies some upgrade of the U.S. forecast.”
“Trump has promised to cut tax rates and make multinational corporations
bring their untaxed earnings back to the U.S. instead of keeping them in other
countries. He also plans to increase spending on infrastructure through a major
infrastructure spending package.”
As if to help confirm the IMF’s positive outlook, Mike Colias reported
@wsj.com yesterday that GM will announce plans this week to invest at
least $1 billion across several U.S. factories.
The move was “aimed at underlining its commitment to U.S. manufacturing jobs
in the wake of President-elect Donald Trump’s criticism of the auto maker’s
imports from Mexico.”
During his press conference last week, Trump thanked Ford and Fiat
Chrysler for recently announced U.S. investment plans expected to create a
combined 2,700 jobs. At the time Trump also said: “I hope that General Motors
will be following. And I think they will be.”
Along the same lines of increasingly positive economic signs, Sarah Nassauer
reported @wsj.com this morning: “Wal-Mart Stores Inc. said it plans to
create about 10,000 U.S. jobs this year, a sign that even the country’s largest
private employer feels the need to tout American job growth ahead of
President-elect Donald Trump’s inauguration.”
Beynd previously planned store openings, store expansions and new
e-commerce services, the “retailer said 24,000 additional construction jobs will
be supported by those efforts.”
Dan Bartlett, Wal-Mart executive vice president of corporate affairs, said in
a press release: “With a presence in thousands of communities and a vast
supplier network, we know we play an important role in supporting and creating
American jobs.”
Therefore, as real-world events and happenings continually defuse and debunk
hapless Democrat politico’s, the changes toward the better are now more
frequently reflected amongst basic, “everyday” people.
An example comes from a Facebook posting by member Janie
Williams who wrote today: “If Democrats of Congress decide not to
attend the inauguration, officials should invite veterans, police, fireman, and
all EMS servicemen to sit in their place.”
That received 697 “Likes”
Ceil Maynard added: “What i don't understand is the number of Black
Americans that are criticizing Steve Harvey for meeting with Trump. I just don't
know what they want. If you try and communicate to improve the lives of some
Americas they don't like that. If you don't try and communicate they don't like
that either. What is it going to take to be one America? Give the man a chance
we vote again in 4 years but maybe just maybe things will be better than they
have been for the past 8 years. I have a feeling the streets could be lined with
gold coins and some people would still not be satisfied.
Another 456 “Likes” followed that one.
And lastly, economist Art Laffer appeared on Stuart Varney’s Varney &
Co on Fox Business Channel this morning. Varney pointedly attempted to force his guest into acknowledging that the many protestors and
anti-Trump zealots presented a significant problem for Trump. Laffer, however,
taking the matter in stride, said that similar responses by the losing side have
occurred throughout the nation’s history.
Varney continued to keep the pressure up, looking for controversy, to which
Laffer wouldn’t respond. And in doing so, Varney turned himself into one who
appeared hostilely agitated and unfamiliar with the nation’s history. Not a very
good idea for one who earns his keep on American TV while being a transplanted,
ill-informed Brit who knows almost nothing about many of the American subjects he
addresses. Yet, he babbles on anyway.
And then another Facebook friend posted this one:
That’s it for today folks.
Adios
No comments:
Post a Comment