The international climate change
conference will take place in Paris, from November 30 to December 11. No
pun intended, but the hot topic will be global warming.
In
that regard, Mother Nature is showing once more that she has a world
class sense of humor to go along with her totally unpredictable weather
activities.
As reported @weather.com/storms,
“Winter Storm Bella will bring the first, not to mention locally heavy,
accumulating snow of the season for some in the Upper Midwest, Corn
Belt, and Great Lakes.
“Winter
storm warnings continue from much of Iowa into northern Illinois and
southern Wisconsin, including the Quad Cities, Madison, Rockford,
Milwaukee and Chicago.
“In
the much of the Upper Midwest, this means a likelihood for at least 6
inches of snow in 12 hours, or 8 inches of snow in 24 hours.”
So,
once again, as often in the past, Nature’s selected the POTUS’s home
town to bring her first early blizzard, to underscore the point that the
global-warming farce is one of the biggest scams ever foisted on
humanity. However, with all those billions being raked in by con men
like AlGore and Tom Steyer, the facts don’t have a prayer of reaching
the public if the administration can help it. Despite the evidence showing that temperatures haven’t changed at all in the past 18 1/2 years.
In that regard, here’s a link to what some prominent global-warming dissenters have to say on the subject: http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/11/19/scientists-declare-un-climate-summit-goals-irrational-based-on-nonsense-leading-us-down-a-false-path/
On another issue, immigration of Syrian’s sought by the POTUS, who claims there is no risk in granting them entry, Christian Datoc, reporter @dailycaller.com,
wrote Thursday: “FBI Director James Corney, “has expressed serious
concerns about pending legislation that would require “national security
officials to certify whether an approved refugee should be allowed to
enter the United States.”
Evan
Perez, CNN’s justice reporter, added: “Director Corney “has some really
grave concerns that this legislation would allow anyone, any refugees”
entry.
Perez
further noted that Comey has expressed his concerns to both the Obama
administration and Congress that, “this requirement, where he would have
to personally sign off on every individual refugee coming from Syria
and Iraq is just frankly impossible.”
Thus,
there are now two questions yet unanswered. First, why would the POTUS
still insist on pursuing his extremely unpopular invitation to
immigrants when practically every other nation is reconsidering their
own open-mindedness of the issue, following the terrorist attacks in
Paris? And second, why would he refuse to even reconsider his open-door
policy when his own FBI director is telling him that certainty safety is “frankly impossible?”
There
are several answers to both of these questions, and quite
unfortunately, not one of them is good for the United States or its
citizens.
And then, a friend posted the following on FB yesterday, as a reminder of what took place tax wise this year.
While
there are those who argue with the specific numbers in the chart, the
information is generally accurate. And, most importantly, is to remember
who in Congress voted for it and why they did it. All Democrats
As far as FB postings go, here is another one from the same friend, which pretty much speaks for itself.
Which brings us to today’s update on Bill Clinton’s wife.
Eric
Pianin in The Fiscal Times on Thursday, reported that Bernie Sanders,
who he calls a self-described Democratic socialist, isn’t buying Bill’s
wife’s claims that she blames Wall Street for most of the country’s
economic ills.
Sanders
said, “I have never heard a candidate – never – who’s received huge
amounts of money from oil, from Wall Street, from the military
industrial complex who doesn’t say, ‘Oh, these contributions will not
influence me. I’m going to be independent.”
Bill’s
wife “testily” complained that Sanders, “Impugned my integrity.” Since
announcing for president in April, Clinton has vowed to rein in Wall
Street.
Mr. Pianin points out: “More importantly, however is that The Washington Post
just handed Sanders and other critics powerful evidence that the
Clinton family is in fact in enormous political debt to Wall Street.”
“A new Washington Post database
documenting an astounding $3 billion in contributions and fees the
Clinton amassed over the past 40 years for their political campaigns,
speeches and the charitable work of the global Clinton Foundation shows
that Wall Street has been one of the Clintons’ biggest political
benefactors.
“The
relationship dates back to 1991, when a then young governor Bill
Clinton of Arkansas impressed a group of high-powered New York bankers,
including then Goldman Sachs co-chairman Robert Rubin, who later became
Treasury Secretary during Clinton’s presidency. [Gee whiz. I guess
there’s no tie to Wall Street there.]
“Since
2000, Hillary Clinton has raised $29.2 million from PACs and employees
of major banks, hedge funds and securities firms for her Senate and
presidential campaigns while her husband raised $39.7 million from Wall
Street sources throughout his political career – or a total of $68.9
million.
Here is the Post’s breakdown of the millions of dollars that the financial sector has contributed to the Clintons since 1992.
- 1992 Bill Clinton presidential campaign -- $11.17 million
- 1996 Bill Clinton presidential campaign -- $28.37 million
- 2000 Hillary Clinton Senate campaign -- $2.13 million
- 2006 Hillary Clinton Senate reelection -- $6.02 million
- 2008 Hillary Clinton presidential campaign -- $14.61 million
- 2016 Hillary Clinton presidential campaign through Sept. 30 -- $6.42 million.
Reader,
Rebel commented: “A testy Clinton complained that Sanders, “Impugned my
integrity.” How could that be, you have to have some before it can be
impugned.”
Which
brings up the ongoing question: Joe Biden, Mayor Bloomberg, Jerry
Brown, or Starbuck’s chairman and CEO, Howard Schultz, are you reading
this?
That’s it for today folks.
Adios
No comments:
Post a Comment