Each day the nation suffers the effects of a far-left presidential agenda. Inflation moves toward a potential 10%, particularly affecting those on fixed incomes. Countless illegal entrants stream across open borders. Major cities are crime fraught. Undelivered freight overflows ports and rail yards as average citizens must decide whether to spend their weakening dollars on gasoline, heating oil or food.
And what is the administration’s primary concern?: Climate change.
What’s most interesting about the climate dread is that, “according to the 2017 U.S. Climate Science Special Report, if yearly emissions continue to increase rapidly, as they have since 2000, models project that by the end of this century, global temperature will be at least 5 degrees Fahrenheit warmer than the 1901-1960 average.”
However, that potential increase is uncertain because they have neither the equipment nor the expertise to project what will happen climatically across a century. In fact, experts can’t tell you with certainty what the temperature or actual weather will be tomorrow morning, much less next week. But, even if the projection is correct, a 5 degree increase over 100 years is certainly manageable without panic.
What is known is that global average surface temperature has risen at an average rate of 0.17°F per decade since 1901.
“According to NOAA's 2020 Annual Climate Report the combined land and ocean temperature has increased at an average rate of 0.13 degrees Fahrenheit ( 0.08 degrees Celsius) per decade since 1880; however, the average rate of increase since 1981 (0.18°C / 0.32°F) has been more than twice that rate.” Which means a 1.3° increase over the next hundred years if things stay exactly the same.
Nonetheless, what would be the actual effect on the Earth if the worst “climate change” took place? “Scientists have predicted that long-term effects of climate change will include a decrease in sea ice and an increase in permafrost thawing, an increase in heat waves and heavy precipitation, and decreased water resources in semi-arid regions. That means,
- Rising sea levels
- Shrinking mountain glaciers.
- Ice melting at a faster rate than usual in Greenland, Antarctica and the Arctic.
- Changes in flower and plant blooming times.
“In its 2019 report, the IPCC projected (chart above) 0.6 to 1.1 meters (1 to 3 feet) of global sea level rise by 2100 (or about 15 millimeters per year) if greenhouse gas emissions remain at high rates.”
So, the water level might be a mere 3 feet higher over the next 100 years, which may be why Streisand, Gore and Obama all have spent multi-millions on ocean front properties as residences without trepidation. They also, along with Kerry, have no compunction whatsoever about flying primarily in private jets.
According to reported data, as of Aug 20, 2021: “Private jet flights produced around 33.7 million metric tons of carbon dioxide in 2016, according to a study published last year in the peer-reviewed journal Global Environmental Change. That's only 4% of total aviation emissions but still more carbon than the entire nation of Denmark emits in a year.”
Meaning that, the nation has acceded global oil production and control to Russia because of a potential 15 millimeter per year sea rise if worst case unfounded projections come true.
Thus, putting the known climate data together we find that what’s happened is a bunch of quasi-literate script readers in Hollywood have reacted to a fabricated threat that in all probability presents no more future danger to the nation than do Alec Baldwin and Robert De Niro to Donald Trump. (Of course, Baldwin may be in jail on a murder rap, taking him completely out of the picture altogether.
The combination of high-profile celebrity types, along with well-compensated politicians with a cause promoted continually by a partnering major media fit perfectly into Saul Alinsky’s theory of organizing people and money around a common vision, valid or not.
Four of Alinsky’s “Rules.”
"Whenever possible go outside the expertise of the enemy."
“Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it. "
"Keep the pressure on."
Most important: "The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself. "
Putting all of this together, coming back to today’s theme we have a party in power at present that cares not a whit about its constituents, employing a scam to terrorize an illiterate mass into supportive votes, hoping to retain control for itself. And while the same might be said of their opposition, at least Republican leaderships are willing to share the wealth.
That’s it for today folks.
Adios
No comments:
Post a Comment