Wednesday, July 15, 2015

BloggeRhythms

Aside from the outright insanity of trusting an already proven deceitful nation, the administration’s capitulation to Iran yesterday has immediately resulted in further international losses. Particularly to the benefit of Vladimir Putin and Russia.
 
Catherine Herridge @FoxNews.com encapsulated Russia’s gains, writing that, “in the last six months, Russia has struck three significant nuclear deals with long-time U.S. Middle East allies, effectively capitalizing on regional distrust of Iran. 
 
“In February, a deal was sealed with the Egyptian government of President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi to help Cairo build and operate its first nuclear reactor. A month later, in March, Jordan signed a $10 billion deal with Russia to build the kingdom's first nuclear power plant, with two 1,000-megawatt reactors in the country's north. And in June, Saudi Arabia and Russia agreed to a deal, the terms of which are not public. But unnamed sources told the Al Arabiya TV network that the kingdom planned to build 16 nuclear reactors that Russia would play a significant role in operating. 
 
“Putin, who analysts say stands to gain the most from a newly empowered Iran, hailed the deal as a tremendous accomplishment, and said in a statement, "We expect that all the parties concerned, primarily the six states involved in the negotiations, will comply with the deal in full. ... Our bilateral relations with Iran will receive a new impetus and will no longer be influenced by external factors."
 
Thus, Russian president Putin now knows he has an absolutely free hand to do as he pleases in the Middle-East. And then, by using that as a stepping-stone, he can then decide where to expand Russia’s interests next.
 
What was truly astonishing, in view of what’s transpired already within the Middle-East, was that, “On Monday, White House spokesman Josh Earnest said the administration's strategy was designed to achieve the opposite effect, to minimize the likelihood of a nuclear arms race.”
 
Now, obviously, even the administration that spokesman Earnest represents can’t be that naïve, ill-informed or unaware of a nuclear armed Iran’s threat to its region, or the rest of the free world. Which means that there’s almost certainly another agenda in play here. And the best guess as to what that objective might be is that Obama’s doing his utmost to please Valerie Jarrett, Patricia Hines, his own wife and Chicago’s self-proclaimed anti-Semite, Reverend Wright.  
 
Regarding another presidential embarrassment, Joel B. Pollak @breitbart.com writes that: “Nearly two weeks after 32-year-old Kathryn Steinle was murdered on San Francisco’s Pier 14 by an illegal alien and convicted felon who was released from prison earlier this year, President Barack Obama has failed to contact the victim’s family or mention her in public. Yet Obama took the time to write (and release) 46 personal letters this month to felons imprisoned for non-violent drug offenses whose sentences he has commuted.
 
“Like the 46 felons to whom Obama wrote, Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez had served time for non-violent offenses, some of them drug-related. After his arrest, Lopez-Sanchez, who had been deported five times to Mexico, confessed to shooting Steinle as she walked with her family at the popular tourist spot.”
 
In this case, regardless of political affiliation, it’s practically impossible to comprehend that any individual would not only expose his nation’s citizens by releasing criminals back to society early, but correspond with them as well. Thus, instead of the POTUS following Saul Alinsky’s primer for “Realistic Radicals,” Alinsky should have taken lessons from him.
 
Which brings us to today’s update on Bill Clinton’s wife, who yesterday gave Republicans a huge gift that likely will keep on giving.
 
According to a National Journal article today: “Hillary Clinton isn’t afraid to talk about global warming—and she wants her fellow Democrats to join her. In closed-door meetings with House and Senate Democrats Tuesday, Clinton jumped at the chance to discuss the hot-button topic in political terms, numerous lawmakers said. Clinton delivered a clear message: Democrats must convince the American public that action to combat Earth's rising temperatures is urgent, and her party can make that case by tailoring their message to different kinds of voters.”
 
However, aside from the fact that temperatures haven’t risen in the past 18 years, thanks to the polar vortex, they’re dropping. And, they’ll keep declining for the next ten years or so, like they have throughout historical cycles. 
 
Thus, it ought to be amusing to see her making outdoor speeches wrapped in a heavy fur coat in Chappaqua freezing her tail off throughout a coming winter that will be worse than the last. 2015 set records for cold throughout much of the nation, especially in the Northeast.
 
Additionally, FoxNews.com reports that, “Hillary Clinton’s sizable lead has been trimmed a bit according to a new Monmouth University poll. Clinton saw support among Democrats and Democratic-leaning voters drop six points since June to 51 percent. Sen. Bernie Sanders, D-Vt., still a distance second at 17 percent, bumped up 5 points from his June showing.”
 
Now, after a six point drop Bill’s wife still has 51% of the Democrat vote, which is a sizable if not insurmountable challenge, for Bernie Sanders at present. However, six points were lost by Bill’s wife in only one month, June. 
 
Therefore, with seventeen months left until the presidential election, if six percent is lost by her in each of them, that equals 102%. Which is twice as much as she has now, and would make her projected vote count a negative 51%. 
 
Which leads to the ongoing question: Mayor Bloomberg and Joe Biden, are you reading this?
 
That's it for today folks.
 
Adios

No comments:

Post a Comment