BloggeRhythms

Illegals flooding the nation, primarily due to tacit permission from the incumbent’s administration, today’s one fraught with a host of other major problems for him.  

 

James Taylor, Forbes contributor on energy and environment issues, reports that “The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s most accurate, up-to-date temperature data confirm the United States has been cooling for at least the past decade.”

 

Here’s where the information came from: “Responding to widespread criticism that its temperature station readings were corrupted by poor siting issues and suspect adjustments, NOAA established a network of 114 pristinely sited temperature stations spread out fairly uniformly throughout the United States. Because the network, known as the U.S. Climate Reference Network (USCRN), is so uniformly and pristinely situated, the temperature data require no adjustments to provide an accurate nationwide temperature record. USCRN began compiling temperature data in January 2005. Now, nearly a decade later, NOAA has finally made the USCRN temperature readings available.”

 

The readings show that: “U.S. temperatures are not rising at all – at least not since the network became operational 10 years ago. Instead, the United States has cooled by approximately 0.4 degrees Celsius, which is more than half of the claimed global warming of the twentieth century.”

 

Then, right on top of  the further disclosure of the warming farce, Michael Barbaro and Coral Davenport, of The New York Times write that: “To environmentalists across Australia, it is a baffling anachronism in an era of climate change: the construction of a 4,000-acre mine in New South Wales that will churn out carbon-laden coal for the next 30 years.”

But, if that isn't enough, it will be interesting to see how they deal with the fact that it’s an “unlikely financial backer in the United States, whose infusion of cash helped set it in motion: Tom Steyer, the most influential environmentalist in American politics, who has vowed to spend $100 million this year to defeat candidates who oppose policies to combat climate change.”

And, “after vowing that he would sell off his investments in companies that generate fossil fuels like coal. An examination of those investments shows that even after his highly public divestment, the coal-related projects his firm bankrolled will generate tens of millions of tons of carbon pollution for years, if not decades, to come.”

Thus, while the magnitude of the hypocrisy delivered by these colossal frauds picking issues that will benefit them personally above all else is astounding, it makes one wonder how any rational human being could be gullible enough to swallow the outright falsities being sold to them continually by leftist charlatans.

Along the same lines, regarding false promises and failing issues, Matt Lewis, of the United Kingdom’s Telegraph, reviewed the incumbent's performance to date Hollywood style, as follows: "The Obama years: 'The trailers were great, the movie was horrible."

Mr. Lewis opines that; “It's not just that Obama has failed in the eyes of most Americans, but that he has also failed to advance his own goals. Yes, of course, there is a laundry list of famous broken promises, including the closing of Guantanamo Bay. But here I'm speaking more broadly. 

 

During President Obama's tenure, income inequality has risen, the black unemployment rate has consistently been twice that of whites, and (despite some tough rhetoric) he has yet to rein in Wall Street. And for a president who talked a lot about civil liberties and privacy, revelations about NSA surveillance, and the use of drones, should have civil libertarians on the left and the right concerned. 

 

The Box Office, err, ballot box was a smashing success, but the reviews are in and the critics and the public - even his fans – are starting to hurl the rotten tomatoes. Citizen Kane this ain't.”

Nonetheless. as horrid as the incumbents been while attempting to perform as POTUS, a job clearly beyond his scope and depth, the one waiting in the wings to take his place has no valid credentials either, other than marrying a consummate politician.    

In her case, whereas she’s presently under pressure regarding huge speaking fees at colleges, she told ABC News she’d donate her pay for speaking at colleges over the past year to charity. 

 

Her chosen charity turns out to be, of course, her own family’s foundation. “So it goes from a foundation at a university to another foundation.”

However, this might well lead to further pressing questions down the line because, “The foundation, which recently financed a multiday event for the Clintons in swing-state Colorado, has spent an estimated $50 million on travel alone.”

Which means that anyone naïve enough to buy her story about “charitable” donations is likely also taken in by Tom Steyer’s global warming rubbish. Which makes one wonder exactly how dumb one has to be to support those most influential in the Democrat party.

That’s it for today folks.

Adios