BloggeRhythms

While Democrats continue their futile attempts to defame and discredit the POTUS, he’s established once again that with time, the vast majority of his claims regarding others actions against him prove to be correct. 

Regarding a current issue at hand, the headline of an article at FoxNews.com by Cody Derespina says it all: “Trump basks in Nunes surveillance news: 'So that means I'm right'”

According to Mr. Derespina: “Several individuals on the Trump team were eventually “unmasked” and had their identities “widely disseminated,” despite the information being of limited intelligence value, Nunes said. The bombshell news conference appeared to partially back up Trump’s assertion earlier this month that former President Barack Obama had “wiretapped” him. 

The source of the revelation is one that certainly has impeccable credentials regarding inappropriate handling of information whereas Devin Nunes is chairman of the United States House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. 

Mr. Derespina went on to relate that while reading another outlet’s article about the Nunes news conference Trump told Time magazine “Wow … so that means I’m right.” 

Content that his claims had been supported by Nunes’ news conference, Trump went on to say: “And a lot of information has just been learned, and a lot of information may be learned over the next coming period of time. We will see what happens. Look, I predicted a lot of things that took a little bit of time.” 

Considering Trump’s being proven correct once again it’s truly remarkable that media types, even friendly ones, continue presenting summations, suppositions and opinions that ultimately prove to be erroneous. 

Yesterday Chris Stirewalt proposed @FoxNews.com that “Trump, who is obsessed with winning, and conservatives, who are obsessed with policy, are both acting in what they believe to be rational ways for their own interests.”

And then, in making his case Stirewalt states that Trump “is an unpopular, divisive figure, who has also seen his young administration perpetually marred – whether you think fairly or not – by scandal.”

From there, Stirewalt projects that “A high-profile loss on TrumpCare would not just diminish his perceived power in Washington, but also likely set off a panic among investors who to this point have been irrationally exuberant about the chances for sweeping economic reforms. Surging stocks and consumer confidence would come tumbling down.” 

So, here we have a highly opinionated columnist telling readers unequivocally not only what the future holds if Trump continues pursuit of his health care revision goals, but that he’s also “unpopular” and “divisive.” 

Yet, on the very same day, according to Henry C. Jackson @politico.com: “President Donald Trump helped to raise more than $30 million at a dinner for House Republicans' campaign arm — a record for the event — while pressing the case for GOP unity during a speech Tuesday. 

“Trump hit broad, familiar talking points at the National Building Museum in Washington while arguing that voters wanted Republicans to act boldly after electing him last year.”

So, in this situation, Stirewalt’s conclusions about Trump’s positions being problematical were absolutely refuted, whereas Republican donors are providing record financial support of his efforts.     

And then, adding further evidence of the worthlessness of information relied upon by political pundits such as Stirewalt, is an article by John Crudele @nypost.com regarding polls, as follows:

“Trump’s approval rating sucks — according to polls. 

“These are the same polls that said Hillary Clinton would be in the White House right now. Not only that, but they said Clinton would easily win the presidency. 

“Pollsters must love these between-election polls because they can report anything and not be proved wrong. It’s when there is an election coming up that they really stick their necks out.”

And then, Mr. Crudele arrives at the critical point regarding commentary whereas: “The media, of course, are complicit in the pollsters’ scam. Without the press, the polls would go unnoticed. 

“So whether Trump’s approval rating is 39 percent or 93 percent, take the numbers with a pillar of salt.” 

Which is the whole point because, as cited above, regardless of what those in the media tried to sell to the public about Clinton's sure win, voters across the nation put Trump in office by record numbers.  

Bringing us to an item that can be kept on the back burner for a while, until some more congressional maneuvering takes place. But, in the meantime, Jerome Hudson @breitbart.com wrote: “Citing investigative reporting by the Government Accountability Institute (GAI) and advance reporting by The Daily Caller News Foundation’s Investigative Group, Rep. Louie Gohmert is calling for a congressional investigation into the connection between Hillary Clinton’s former campaign chairman, John Podesta, and Russia. 

“Podesta sat on the board of the Putin-connected energy company alongside Russian officials who received $35 million from a Putin-linked Russian government fund, Breitbart News reported last August, as revealed in a 56-page GAI report titled “From Russia with Money: Hillary Clinton, the Russian Reset, and Cronyism.” 

“Now Gohmert, the Texas Republican firebrand who sits on the House Judiciary Committee, says Podesta’s role in the Russia-funded firm “certainly needs to be reviewed to see if there really is something nefarious going on with these activities.” 

“Podesta also sat on the executive board of an energy company, Joule Unlimited, which also received millions from a Putin-connected Russian government fund. The longtime Democratic operative owned “75,000 common shares” in Joule, which Podesta had transferred to a holding company called Leonidio LLC. 

There’s much more to the complicated story. Here’s a link:http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/03/22/congressman-calls-federal-probe-john-podestas-board-membership-firms-linked-russian-investors/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social

So, while Democrats counter their lacking of an effective political platform with attacks on their rivals instead, those rivals have some quite valid targets as well. Which leads to the distinct possibility that most leftist politico’s will not only remain unelectable, but some of its top leadership may very well leave the scene in handcuffs. 

That’s it for today folks. 

Adios