BloggeRhythms

It’s difficult to get one’s head around others acceptance of irrational ideas. Particularly concepts so extreme, they cannot possibly stand up to the most basic application of logic. Yet, citizens will soon be paying as much as six, seven or more dollars a gallon for gas because computer models indicated to leftists that the climate is destined to change harmfully in the unidentifiable future. What’s more, fossil fuel prices being the cornerstone, most other costs of living will reflect similar increases, dramatically affecting budgets of the least able to afford them.

Remarkably, with inflation seeming here to stay, Biden and the four female lunatic hard-lefters in Congress still determinedly ignore strains on constituents budgets although it’s doubtful any one of them actually grasps what “climate-change“ is all about. Nonetheless, for them every utterance, conversation or other interchange warns of the coming “climate “change,” as an ingrained part of everyday communication.

Sadly, however, it’s doubtful that climatology is in fact a deep concern for any of the five noted above, nor is the probability high that there is significant knowledge of the subject among them. The ideology is far more likely nothing more than a major plank in their party’s platform.

Therefore, were there true conversations had about the actual subject, one wonders how any of these climate-change zealots could rightfully explain their fanaticism in view of the existence of El Nino, which Wikipedia explains as follows:

“Spanish: El Niño, lit. 'The Boy' (/ɛl ˈniːn.joʊ/; Spanish: [el ˈniɲo]) is the warm phase of the El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) and is associated with a band of warm ocean water that develops in the central and east-central equatorial Pacific (approximately between the International Date Line and 120°W), including the area off the Pacific coast of South America. The ENSO is the cycle of warm and cold sea surface temperature (SST) of the tropical central and eastern Pacific Ocean. El Niño is accompanied by high air pressure in the western Pacific and low air pressure in the eastern Pacific. El Niño phases are known to last close to four years; however, records demonstrate that the cycles have lasted between two and seven years. During the development of El Niño, rainfall develops between September–November.^{[clarification needed][1]} The cool phase of ENSO is Spanish: La Niña, lit. 'The Girl', with SSTs in the eastern Pacific below average, and air pressure high in the eastern Pacific and low in the western Pacific. The ENSO cycle, including both El Niño and La Niña, causes global changes in temperature and rainfall.”

“Developing countries that depend on their own agriculture and fishing, particularly those bordering the Pacific Ocean, are usually most affected. In this phase of the Oscillation, the pool of warm water in the Pacific near South America is often at its warmest about Christmas."

And then there’s the “polar vortex,” described as a “low pressure area—a wide expanse of swirling cold air—that is parked in polar regions. During winter, the polar vortex at the North Pole expands, sending cold air southward. This happens fairly regularly and is often associated with outbreaks of cold temperatures in the United States.”

“Often when the polar vortex is strong, temperatures are mild in the mid-latitudes across the Eastern US and Northern Eurasia; and when the vortex is weak, temperatures tend to be cold across the Eastern US and northern Europe and Asia.”

What's most important to grasp from the preceding is that “The ENSO cycle, including both El Niño and La Niña, causes global changes in temperature and rainfall.” And therefore, it is not computer models that determine climate activity in the future, but the proclivities of nature itself. As a result, unpredictable spans of global warming, global cooling along with periods of neutrality will occur in times ahead.

Consequently, considering what is currently at stake regarding the massive negative effects of inflation on everyday citizens, there should be some serious debate regarding the costs incurred from “climate-change,” particularly since Biden and his Congresswomen supporters position rests squarely upon unsupportable supposition.

That’s it for today folks.

Adios