Today’s another with items to be added to my growing list of questions regarding what needs to be done to curtail politicians from making decisions on a purely self-serving basis, totally ignoring the welfare of the nation and its population.
Only yesterday I mentioned Eris Holder’s contention that American “civil rights” be granted to illegal aliens. That premise is so far away from the objectives and intentions of our founding fathers that I ran out of words to describe the magnitude of disrespect Holder has for each and every citizen having been born here, or otherwise properly earning the honor.
The inanity here was similar to the raid in Benghazi, where politics caused the administration to fill the airwaves with scads of liars while preferring to weaken the nation’s foreign outposts to please misguided constituents, rather than protecting the lives of our dedicated diplomats.
Then there are the cases of raising taxes on the “rich” purely for ideological purposes, regardless that this has caused unemployment to remain at unnecessary highs, choked business growth and development and forced huge overseas investment that should be made here.
Beyond that, almost too misguided and illogical from a business standpoint to believe, the administration would rather plunge the nation into $17 billion in debt than relax moronic regulations prohibiting growth. So they’re collecting pennies in fines while countless, taxable dollars will never be made due to upside-down philosophical beliefs about redistribution of wealth.
At the same time, these same zealots stand by and watch as the greatest healthcare system on the planet implodes from a program jerry-rigged together by platoons of card-carrying morons. In effect, permitting the government to reformulate something as important as this is like allowing a zoo-full of baboons to take over NASA.
And now today we’re seeing increasing concerns about how the terrorist attack in Boston’s being handled. Because the rush to cut off discussion of potential involvement by other subversives wouldn’t look good for an administration that said terrorism ended with the demise of bin Laden.
However, despite the continual attempts to cover-up and confuse any happening that might refute the BS emanating from the White House, even Democrats although their words are chosen quite carefully, are beginning to suspect the Boston attack might be more involved.
There are many examples on the web, but I chose this one at random from Fox News on-line: “California Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff, also a member of the House Intelligence Committee, said Sunday that the suspects being linked to a major terror group appears unlikely.
However, he told CNN’s “State of the Union: "It does look like a lot of radicalization was self-radicalization online, but we don't know the full answers yet."
And there’s the nub of the whole situation.
Whereas we truly don’t know yet, why has it been decided that these two subversives acted alone? What was the reason for the rush to judgment? Well, we all know the answer to that one, so I won’t write another three pages here.
But, coming back to my original point and the preceding examples, I sincerely believe there has to be some mechanism created to prevent pure politicians with no governance skills, experience or capabilities from destroying a nation purely for ideological and/or personal reasons.
And, while up to now, most of the colossal mistakes and misjudgments are likely curable in time, with our cities now at stake to bombers, critical decision making is required from qualified experts, not more biased campaign speeches made on stumps.
That’s it for today folks.
Adios
No comments:
Post a Comment