In an article @FoxNews.com, Judge Jeanine Pirro chastised those
Republican voters refusing to support, or who are against, candidate Trump.
The judge wrote: “Their primary strategy as it relates to Donald Trump right
now is dead wrong.
“And it will cost them the election and the White House.
“There has been trouble brewing behind the scenes that has occasionally
seeped out.
“But this week Republicans took a direct hit at Donald Trump, their leading
Republican presidential frontrunner in every national poll.
“Last I heard only animals eat their young--and maybe a few cannibals.
The judge then gave this example: “Republican Governor Nikki Haley was
designated by Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell to rebut President Obama’s last
state of the union address. Instead of taking the opportunity to identify how
this Democratic administration has failed us, she takes a shot at -- and
chastises -- Donald Trump.”
However, although the judge may be precisely correct in her analysis, and it
may be most unpleasant to have a candidate from one’s own party shot at or
chastised, Governor Haley was actually attempting to protect her party’s
presidential chances by demeaning Trump. Because, she obviously feels, as do
many other top Republicans, that he’s not electable by the majority of the
voting public.
Reader johannesd, summed the situation up this way: “Who is
extremely likely NOT to vote for Trump, in order of importance: democrats,
african-americans, hispanics, women, independents, LBTG folk, and republicans
who support the establishment. There you have it. Chances of Trump winning the
presidency: ask the bookmakers in Vegas.”
And that’s what Governor Haley and top Republicans are worried about.
On another subject, according to World Economic Forum research, “Over five
million jobs will be lost by 2020 as a result of developments in genetics,
artificial intelligence, robotics and other technological change.
“About 7 million jobs will be lost and 2 million gained as a result of
technological change in 15 major developed and emerging economies, WEF founder
Klaus Schwab and managing board member Richard Samans said in "The Future of
Jobs." The findings are taken from a survey of 15 economies covering about 1.9
billion workers, or about 65 percent of the world’s total workforce.”
At this point in time, news about the revolution in automation is increasing
steadily, as it has for quite some time by now. And one of the primary causes for
replacing the human workforce is increases in wages without similar advances in
productivity. Which means that employers are simply paying more for the same work output
result. And, therefore, by pushing for still higher wages, Democrats are
forcing employers to accelerate their automation plans, reducing the workforce
size as a result.
Thus, if liberals really wanted to improve their constituents lives and
incomes, they’d be forcing schools to actually educate students instead of
protecting worthless, slide-through, curriculums, while supporting unionized sub-standard teachers
in particular. They’d also back off and stop placing reelection politicking
above facing the truth in regard to the massive uneducated numbers that vote for
them because they simply don’t know any better.
Reader, Joyce Witt-Vaughn, commented: “Sounds like most of us have the right
answers, but we are not the dingbats in Washington are we. I think congress and
the senate need term limits for every seat, and have to live on the little means
they expect us to exist on daily, things would change fast. They especially need
our health care coverage.”
Bringing us to today’s update on Bill Clinton’s wife.
An article @breitbart.com via Drudge regards an “Aaron
Klein Investigative Radio” interview with Linda Tripp. She was a pivotal figure in the Monica
Lewinsky scandal, who claimed on the Sunday show, that it was common
knowledge while she worked in the West Wing that Bill Clinton had affairs with
“thousands of women.”
In this case, whether accusations made by Ms Tripp are precisely accurate or
not, her commentary reveals a critically important aspect of Bill’s wife’s
persona that will continue to drag on her presidential campaign.
Ms Tripp recalled Bill's wife “January 27, 1998 appearance on NBC’s The
Today Show in which she was seen as standing by her husband while blaming
the Lewinsky scandal on a “vast right-wing conspiracy that has been conspiring
against my husband since the day he announced for president.”
“She didn’t do it in an honest way,” said Tripp of Clinton’s NBC interview.
“Instead she lied, which didn’t surprise me. And I will give her credit. She is
enormously effective. And became a victim. A wife who was betrayed.”
And then, Ms Tripp came to the aspect of Bill’s wife modus operando that
may eventually become part of her campaigns undoing, saying: “This is someone
who had no real personal problem with any of this behavior. The problem was in
it becoming public. They had to continue to become electable… She was the more
aggressive one in ensuring that the political viability was not endangered in
any way.”
Tripp then told Klein that Hillary “does not possess integrity on any level.
I just wish that your listeners could know the person that I knew. Because if
they did there is not a chance she would be elected president.”
However, although Ms. Tripp apparently did not think that “listeners” were
not close enough to Bill’s wife to determine that she’s basically untrustworthy,
recent poll numbers indicate that they most certainly are. Further compounded by negative
information amassing from her Benghazi missteps, cover-ups, unauthorized use of
private email servers and issues underlying ongoing FBI investigations.
Therefore, with continuing situations arising, such as the one discussed
above today, the continuing question has to be asked once again: Joe Biden,
Mayor Bloomberg, Jerry Brown, and Starbuck’s chairman and CEO, Howard Schultz,
are you guys reading this?
That’s it for today folks.
Adios
No comments:
Post a Comment