There’s another Republican “debate” tonight. The roster includes eight
candidates that have been clogging the media outlets 24, 7 for what seems like a
couple of years by now. Which brings up the only real question left: Is there
any voter in the nation who isn’t already totally familiar with everything anyone
would want to know about all of these guys? So, what is there to debate
about?
On the other hand, one might also want to know where Trump, Carson, Cruz and
Rubio are going to get the experience needed to successfully head the
administration of the United States by election day. Not one of them has the
slightest knowledge of governing anything, with their greatest skills being the
ability to sling mud at each other with no proof of governing success among
them, whatsoever.
Along the same lines, there’s an early evening debate of lower-polling
candidates Rand Paul; Carly Fiorina; Mike Huckabee; and Rick Santorum. The only
question for all of them is why are they still in the race, whereas no one’s
interested in any of them at all.
And now, here’s all anyone needs to know about the current administration,
and what to expect if any Democrat is elected next time around.
Terence P. Jeffrey @cnsnews.com reports: “The federal government
took in a record of approximately $765,645,000,000 in tax revenues in the first
three months of fiscal 2016 (Oct. 1, 2015 through Dec. 31, 2015), according to
the Monthly Treasury Statement released today.
“That equaled approximately $5,107 for every person in the country who had
either a full or a part-time job in December.
“It is also an increase of about $24,288,810,000 in constant 2015 dollars
from the $741,356,190,000 in revenue (in constant 2015 dollars) that the
Treasury took in during the first three months of fiscal 2015.”
And now, the incredible part. Despite collecting more revenues than ever
before in the nation’s history: “As it was hauling in these record revenues, the
Treasury spent approximately $981,190,000,000, and ended up the first three
months of the fiscal year with a deficit of approximately $215,546,000,000,
according to the monthly statement.”
Yet, what’s truly incredible is that while this devastating news regarding
total fiscal mismanagement by government has now been published, Democrat
candidates are still demanding more. They’re preaching about increasing
government spending, further taxation of individuals, surcharges on the “rich”
and growing the number of federal programs and employees.
Therefore, what’s happening is that as Democrats move farther and farther
left, spending every nickel in sight, pretty soon there actually won’t be
anything "left" to spend at all.
Which brings us to todays update on Bill Clinton’s wife.
Today, FoxNews’ Judge Andrew P. Napolitano titled an article: “Why
Hillary Clinton's legal woes are grave or even fatal: A tale of two smoking
guns”
The judge writes: “The failure to safeguard state secrets is an area of the
law in which the federal government has been aggressive to the point of being
merciless. State secrets are the product of members of the intelligence
community's risking their lives to obtain information.
“Before she was entrusted with any state secrets -- indeed, on her first full
day as secretary of state -- Clinton received instruction from FBI agents on how
to safeguard them; and she signed an oath swearing to comply with the laws
commanding the safekeeping of these secrets. She was warned that the failure to
safeguard secrets -- known as espionage -- would most likely result in
aggressive prosecution.”
“The evidence of Clinton’s negligence is overwhelming. The FBI now has more
than 1,300 protected emails that she received on her insecure server and sent to
others -- some to their insecure servers. These emails contained confidential,
secret or top-secret information, the negligent exposure of which is a criminal
act.”
Then this weekend, “Catherine Herridge and Pamela Browne learned from
government sources that the FBI is investigating whether Clinton made any
decisions as secretary of state to benefit her family foundation or her
husband’s speaking engagements. If so, this would be profound public corruption.
Several teams of independent researchers have been investigating the Clinton
Foundation for a few years, amassing “a treasure-trove of documents
demonstrating fraud and irregularities in fundraising and expenditures, and they
have shown a pattern of favorable State Department treatment of foreign entities
coinciding with donations by those entities to the Clinton Foundation and their
engaging former President Bill Clinton to give speeches.”
And then comes the judge’s expectation for the future: “There are now more
than 100 FBI agents investigating Hillary Clinton. Her denial that she is at the
core of their work is political claptrap with no connection to reality. It is
inconceivable that the FBI would send such vast resources in the present
dangerous era on a wild-goose chase.
“It is the consensus of many of us who monitor government behavior that the
FBI will recommend indictment. That recommendation will go to Attorney General
Loretta Lynch, who, given Clinton’s former status in the government and current
status in the Democratic Party, will no doubt consult the White House.
“If a federal grand jury were to indict Clinton for espionage or corruption,
that would be fatal to her political career.
“If the FBI recommends indictment and the attorney general declines to do so,
expect Saturday Night Massacre-like leaks of draft indictments, whistleblower
revelations and litigation, and FBI resignations, led by the fiercely
independent and intellectually honest FBI Director James Comey himself.
“That would be fatal to Clinton’s political career, as well.”
So, it appears that slowly but surely, the case against Bill’s wife is
building continually. And that slowness is frustrating many whom are wishing to
see her political undoing. However, this is a process that to be effective and
conclusive, has to be completed impeccably. If not, the entire case could well
unravel.
There are still ten months until November, providing the time needed for the FBI in
particular to insure a solid indictment. It also leads to the ongoing
question: Joe Biden, Mayor Bloomberg, Jerry Brown, and Starbuck’s chairman and
CEO, Howard Schultz, are you guys reading this?
That’s it for today folks.
Adios
No comments:
Post a Comment