BloggeRhythms

Observing the results of Tuesday’s elections, what’s beginning to take hold are the turnabouts that took place. Many of which will have huge future significance.

 

Yesterday, Friday, Rush provided his perspective on a subject covered here on the day before. The incumbent president’s apparent disregard for the rejection of his policy’s evidenced by the Republican landslide wins across the country.

 

Rush specifically addressed a Peggy Noonan piece in the Wall Street Journal in which she wrote: "It is confounding -- not surprising but stunning, unhelpful and ill-judged -- that the president is instead going for antagonism, combat and fruitless friction."

 

Rush responded: “What she is reacting to here is Obama not understanding that he got skunked in this election. She doesn't understand why Obama is going to continue to antagonize, why he wants to stay combative, and why he wants to cause this fruitless friction. She's wondering why can't Obama understand that he lost, take the meaning that he lost and start working with the Republicans to make a wonderful, beautiful Mr. Rogers' Neighborhood country.”

 

Then Rush explained the incumbent’s reaction this way: “He's an angry man. He's not cool. He's not calm. He's not collected. He's a narcissist. He's a community organizer, and what do they do? They agitate. By definition, that's all they do. He's not gonna slink away. He's not gonna admit defeat. Did you hear what he said in the press conference? "I'm gonna listen to the two-thirds that didn't vote." Hey, Mr. President, the two-thirds that didn't vote are the ones that walked out on you in all of your campaign appearances the last two weeks before the election. (imitating Obama) "I don't care. I'm gonna focus on the two-thirds that didn't vote. Those people are so disenfranchised, so upset, that's what I'm gonna do."

 

And in that explanation, Rush underlined my point made Wednesday, which was that those who stayed home certainly did vote. Although they didn’t go to the polls, they certainly understood what their absence was going to cost in lost support for Democrat candidates at every level, which in turn, was a direct refutation of the incumbent’s philosophies, beliefs and positions.

 

Further evidence of the incumbent’s actions proving that he hasn’t risen above the level of community organizer, certainly not becoming in any way a mature, competent, leader and/or statesman, is found in an item from pjmedia.com/tatler/2014 via Drudge, as follows:

 

Over a year ago, “On October 17, 2013, President Obama said: “You don’t like a particular policy or a particular president? Then argue for your position. Go out there and win an election. Push to change it. But don’t break it. Don’t break what our predecessors spent over two centuries building. That’s not being faithful to what this country’s about.”

 

However, “Obama’s threat to carry out a unilateral amnesty for millions of illegal aliens threatens the system that he claimed to defend just over a year ago. And he is well aware of that.”

 

Therefore, what the incumbent’s current actions demonstrate is that all the verbiage and rhetoric delivered almost daily for the past six years has no real value. Whereas he rarely, if ever, stays true to his word. But the most significant aspect of Tuesday’s election results is that now the majority of voters, even those of his own state, county and party, is unequivocally aware of his professional immaturity, anger and narcism, proving it with either their votes or refusal to go to the polls in support of him.

 

That’s it for today folks.

 

Adios