Two well known individuals having keen, well-versed, insight into politics
and indicative trends confirmed today, the premise made here for the past week
or so. That by their present actions Democrat leaders are decimating their
party’s future hopes.
First we have Michael Goodwin @nypost.com, who began his column:
“Thank you, Hillary Clinton. Thank you for reminding America about the
importance of Donald Trump’s victory and of the awful consequences if you had
won.”
Referring to the taunting tweet of “3-0” she sent after the three-judge
panel halted Trump’s executive order on immigrants and refugees, Mr. Goodwin
wasn’t surprised at all whereas in the past Clinton said she was for open
borders at one point. “[B]ut the gutter sniping was telling” he went on, because
the “activist judges who based their ruling on their liberal politics instead of
the Constitution are the same kind she would appoint to the Supreme Court and
all other federal courts if she were in the Oval Office.”
Thankful that Clinton didn't get the chance, Mr. Goodwin further believes
that there are reasons why the Court of Appeals ruling could be a blessing in
disguise for Trump.
First of the two biggest benefits is that liberals “hatred for Trump and his
supporters overshadows any concern for national security. The ruling that the
government showed “no evidence” that the travel ban would prevent terrorism is
preposterous and should alarm every American.
“Any such evidence would be classified and certainly wouldn’t be produced in
a hasty, one-hour hearing, which the judges conducted over the telephone. The
Constitution and laws give the president wide authority to decide whether the
entry of “any class of alien” would harm the United States.”
As a result, by claiming authority for itself, “the court grossly oversteps
and obliterates the separation of powers. It also opens itself to public fury if
the ruling opens the door to terrorists.”
Mr. Goodwin’s second point involves the lessons learned about the difficulty
of the road ahead and that nothing can be taken for granted. “Every inch of
progress will require intense preparation and a willingness to battle on
multiple fronts.”
Although the executive order was sensible in its goals, it was rushed before
Trump’s team was in place, and vulnerable as a result. Nonetheless, what’s taken place yields long-range positive results because:
“Those are rookie mistakes, driven in part by Democrats’ delaying tactics in
confirming Attorney General Sessions and others. Yet that reality only
underscores how deep the hostility is and how little room there is for error.
The lynch mob can succeed only if the White House provides the rope.
“As a candidate and president, Trump has endured slings and arrows
unprecedented in modern times. The onslaught is also harming America, but the
madness will be bearable if he finishes the revolution he started.”
Coming on the same day as Mr. Goodwin’s article, pollster Doug Schoen
similarly concluded that if Democrats fail to find opportunities to cooperate
with Trump “they will lose to a more canny Republican candidate in the general
election and increase the likelihood that Trump gains a filibuster-proof
Senate.”
While believing that many Democratic disagreements with Trump’s executive
orders are valid and there is a clear opportunity for opposition on the basis of
faults and flaws, Schoen also opines that they’ve driven deep division within
the Democratic party, pitting center-left politicians against protesting
activists forming “The Resistance.”
“However, if Democrats want to win back power they cannot do so by moving
further left, resisting Trump at every move, and taking to the streets.
“Put simply, the Democratic Party is on life support and there is a quiet,
but ruthless, war being fought over its future.”
From there Schoen goes on to employ basic statistical evidence to illustrate
that the extreme postures taken by anti-Trump activists, protestors, and
Senators such as Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, are problematical because:
“America itself remains a fundamentally center-right nation.”
“A fundamental belief in national sovereignty and individual responsibility,
married to cautious skepticism of government and deeply held moral convictions,
continues to govern how most Americans think about politics.
“Trump's ascendance is rooted in America’s preference for center-right
policy. As the Democratic Party shifted ever leftwards under Obama, it suffered
net losses of 11 Senate seats, 62 House seats, and 10 governorships since 2010,
as well as nearly 1000 state legislative seats.”
Yet, despite the losses and believing their only path to victory is
mobilization, leftist forces are pushing the party away from the American
public, which fundamentally is center-right. And by channeling the concerns and
priorities of the core Democratic coastal base, "fully one third of sitting
Democratic congressional leaders now hail from New York,
California, and Massachusetts."
Recent public polling clearly confirms that while Democrat leaders are far to
the left, the national electorate "remains center-right on issues ranging from
immigration to tax policy to abortion ."
“A January 2017 Politico-Harvard Poll found that 57% of the general public
believes that unauthorized immigrants currently in the United States are a
serious problem, echoing a key Trump concern.
“Further, 50% of Americans support banning future immigration from regions
with active terrorist groups, as Trump has attempted to do with his recent
controversial executive order.
“The Politico-Harvard poll also found that when it comes to tax policy, 63%
of Americans believe that lowering corporate taxes would be effective at
bringing jobs and business back to the United States. Fully 53% believe that
proposed Republican cuts on federal income taxes, which Democrats have pledged
to resist, will benefit them personally.
A January 2017 Knights of Columbus/Marist Poll clearly shows that “74% of
Americans—including 77% of women—support limiting abortion to at least the first
trimester. 59% of the American public, including 59% of women, believe abortion
is morally wrong. Yet Planned Parenthood president Cecile Richards was a
featured speaker at the 2016 Democratic National Convention.”
“Abortion also represents a key policy area where liberal efforts to organize
mass protests like the numerous “women’s marches” on January 21st may
actually do more to divide women and drive voters to the Republican Party,
rather than unite people around any particular cause.”
As a result; “Looking forward, Republicans are poised to leverage the
Democrats’ failure to perceive the political character of the nation, and make
considerable gains in the 2018 midterm elections.
“In fact, of the 33 senate seats up for election in 2018, Democrats must
defend 23 seats, whereas Republicans only need to defend 8 seats.
“The remaining two Senators up for re-election are Independents Bernie
Sanders and Angus King, who caucus with the Democratic Party.”
All of which leads Schoen to conclude that, as stated at the outset
above: “Despite what the Democratic base wants, if these Trump-state Democrats
fail to find opportunities to cooperate with Trump, or at least position
themselves as centrists congruent with their constituents’ beliefs, they will
lose to a more canny Republican candidate in the general election and increase
the likelihood that Trump gains a filibuster-proof Senate.
“While the Democratic Party's progressive and moderate wings clash with one
another over their party’s future, Republicans are dismantling the blue wall and
solidifying America’s status as a center-right nation.”
Thus, while it’s reassuring to gain confirmation of one’s thoughts from
recognized experts in their respective fields, their conclusions aren’t rocket
science. In fact, they’re far closer to the most simple logic. Because what most
Americans have always desired is individual freedom, minimal
government interference and unbridled opportunity. Precisely the opposite of
leftist philosophy and right in the middle of Trump’s wheelhouse.
That’s it for today folks.
Adios
No comments:
Post a Comment