New York Post columnist, Michael Goodwin, appeared on Fox &
Friends this morning. One of his contentions was that Trump's correct in
attempting to build bridges with the leftist mainstream media. He used the
New York Times as an example, believing that they can be convinced to
open their minds and once again, return to unbiased reportage instead of spewing
leftist propaganda.
As one having great respect for Mr. Godwin, I’m not so sure that that’s the answer. Because, the general public
is fixing the problem on its own. As last reported, the Times had 1.4
million digital-only subscribers and a a daily print circulation of 590,000,
roughly 2 million people in total. Trump, however, received 62 million votes to
date which means that he’s got a 60 million person edge in audience
favorability. Thus, the best approach seems to be to simply ignore the Times and
let it continue to disintegrate on its own.
Adding confirmation to the premise of reader disenchantment,
FoxNews.com separately reported today: “The public editor for The New
York Times said Sunday that the number of complaints the newspaper received over
its coverage of the 2016 presidential campaign spiked to five times its normal
level.
“Complaints to the paper included claims that its coverage was biased against
Trump during the general election as well as accusations from readers that it
favored candidate Hillary Clinton over Bernie Sanders during the Democratic
primaries.
The publication's public editor, Liz Spayd, wrote.“My colleague Thomas Feyer,
who oversees the letters to the editor, says the influx from readers is one of
the largest since Sept. 11.”
“Spayd says others are calling into customer care at multiple times the usual
rate and had “a variety of concerns, including the election coverage.”
Aside from media audience-shrinkage, national trends appear to illustrate
significant movement away from leftists altogether, as also reported by
FoxNews.com.
“Rep. Tim Ryan said on Fox Business Network’s “Mornings with Maria” that
President-elect Donald Trump’s victory – combined with the GOP protecting its
majorities in the House and Senate – sent a clear signal to lawmakers that
“working-class” Americans had “flipped their middle finger to the
establishment.”
“I am pulling the fire alarm right now, is what I’m doing in the Democratic
Party,” Ryan said of his challenge to [Nancy] Pelosi. “I believe we are in
denial of what’s happened, and I’m pulling the fire alarm because the house is
burning down.”
“We better get our act together or we will cease being a national party,”
Ryan said. “We are going to be a regional party that fails to get into the
majority and fails to do things on behalf of those working-class people that
were the back of the Democratic Party for so long.”
“The problem is they talk to people in segments,” Ryan told The Washington
Post on Monday. “Here’s our LGBT community. Here’s our labor guy. That doesn’t
work. You stop becoming a national party.”
As mentioned here yesterday, while socialists Sanders and Ellison will take
the party backwards, Schumer hasn’t a shred of personal job experience in the
private sector either. And what’s worse for them, after their party took a major
shellacking in this election, none of them have an iota of an idea as to why.
Reader, ObamaMessiahOfGOP, summed the Democrat party’s obtuseness
this way: “Americans need decent JOBS. J-O-B-S!! Offering people "free
college" (another farce) only to go work at a burger joint is not real economic
progress or success. Endless talk about raising the minimum wage only means you
are failing to create real economic growth with decent good paying jobs.
“Democrats are the party of "businesses don't create jobs". A party this
stupid should never hold power again.”
And, it certainly appears that ObamaMessiahOfGOP’s prediction for
the party’s future is absolutely correct.
And then, a different perspective on the “Hamilton” controversy
came from Rush, as usual, yesterday. He took the time to step back and point out that it’s
highly unlikely that the troop playing their roles have the slightest idea who
Hamilton was, or what he stood for. Which is typical of today’s uneducated,
highly vocal, whining, spoiled liberals.
Rush explained: “The actor who spoke to Pence, Brandon Victor Davis, said,
"We hope this show has inspired you." You know what the show's about? I mean,
it's Hamilton. It's about a vice president who shoots a political rival and
gets away with it, Burr, in a duel. Do you know that Alexander Hamilton was an
immigration hawk? I wonder if the people in this cast have any idea who they
are lionizing and celebrating. This guy's Donald Trump. Alexander Hamilton was
a huge nationalist. He did not like states' rights. He wanted a massive
federal government.”
So, once again leftists have proven that while most things they rail against
politically aren’t factual, those that are true are usually quite damaging to
the greater public in general.
What’s also quite interesting is reportage from dailymail.co.uk/news
showing that RadarOnline investigated whether or not the Hamilton actors had voted and
revealed many hadn't in years.
“Dixon's records show he didn't vote during president Obama's reelection bid
in 2012.
“Javier Munoz, playing the titular role of Hamilton, registered to vote in
2006 and voted in the mid-term elections, but hasn't been on record as voting
since.
“Seth Stewart, who plays Thomas Jefferson, voted in 2008 when Obama ran for
the first time. He did not vote in 2012.
“Okieriete “Oak” Onaodowan, who players James Madison and Hercules Mulligan,
registered to vote in 2005 but hasn't been on record voting since.”
Illustrating that, although these two-bit phony’s will avail themselves of a
captive audience in a Broadway theater to admonish those perceived as
adversarial, they won’t even bother to take their own time to vote, which is the
most powerful way for citizens to voice displeasure.
Yet, despite the movement away from liberalism and Trump’s astounding
presidia win, he may already have guaranteed himself to be a one-term POTUS
presiding over a hoodwinked electorate.
Daniel Halper @nypost.com, wrote just this morning that
“President-elect Donald Trump won’t subject Hillary Clinton to a criminal
inquiry — instead, he’ll help her heal, his spokeswoman said Tuesday.”
Kellyanne Conway told the hosts of MSNBC’s “Morning Joe: “I think when the
president-elect who’s also the head of your party … tells you before he’s even
inaugurated he doesn’t wish to pursue these charges, it sends a very strong
message, tone and content, to the members.”
Conway, now on the Trump transition team, said in her interview: “Look, I
think, he’s thinking of many different things as he prepares to become the
president of the United States, and things that sound like the campaign are not
among them.”
And in that short phrase, Conway likely lost countless followers for her
boss. Because, if voters can’t count on those promises made while campaigning,
what was the purpose of his campaign? In fact, he now sounds exactly like Bill
Clinton’s wife, who admitted to Goldman Sachs that she had two agendas. One for
the public and another, which was for herself and those who paid for her
assistance to them.
Conway went on to say: “I think Hillary Clinton still has to face the fact
that a majority of Americans don’t find her to be honest or trustworthy, but if
Donald Trump can help her heal, then perhaps that’s a good thing.”
But that’s a far cry from the the second presidential debate in October, a much harsher Trump vowed: “If I win, I am going to
instruct my attorney general to get a special prosecutor to look into your
situation because there has never been so many lies, so much deception.”
And now, he’s in precisely the same position as Bill's wife, whereas he outright lied to his
constituents as he deceived them himself.
Oh well, although he’s only been POTUS-elect for two weeks or so before
self-destructing, it sure was nice while it lasted. And now, we’re right back to
politicians as usual, which really isn’t all that surprising.
That’s it for today folks.
Adios
No comments:
Post a Comment