A Fox News.com headline this morning states: “ObamaCare may
force employers to pull the plug on millions of health plans, CBO report finds”
In the latest report to undercut President Obama's "If you like your health 
care plan, you can keep it" promise, the Congressional Budget Office projects 
millions of workers will leave employer-sponsored health plans over the next 
decade because of ObamaCare.  
“Some will opt to go on Medicaid, but others will be kicked off their company 
plans by employers who decide not to offer coverage anymore, according to a 
new CBO report titled,  "Federal Subsidies for Health Insurance Coverage for 
People Under Age 65: 2016 to 2026." 
"As a result of the ACA, between 4 million and 9 million fewer people are 
projected to have employment-based coverage each year from 2017 through 2026 
than would have had such coverage if the ACA had never been enacted,” the 
report, released Thursday, said. 
While the CBO found that more people will enroll in Medicaid than 
previously predicted, fewer will be covered through the public insurance 
marketplaces mandated by the Affordable Care Act. But regardless of the specific reasons 
for the enrollment shrinkage, the end result is less people 
insured because the program was instituted in the first place. 
Reader, HollyToo, summed it up perfectly this way: “Liberals and 
Progressive are firmly convinced they can do socialized medicine better than all 
the other countries that have tried the system and failed. The following quote 
helps put things in the proper perspective: “Insanity: Doing the same thing over 
and over again and expecting different results.” Quote by: Albert 
Einstein”
And then another financial genius, Governor Jerry Brown, sent the California 
Legislature a proposal yesterday to boost the state's minimum wage to $15.00 per hour. He 
defended the raise “as one that furthers economic equality and 
one that he hopes other states will follow.”
At a news conference at the state Capitol, "surrounded by Democrats and labor 
union leaders," he added: "I'm hoping that what happens in California will not 
stay in California, but spread all across the country. It's a matter of economic 
justice. It makes sense.” 
At the same time: Bryan Dean Wright @latimes.com/opinion/op-ed, 
writes: “A viral video released in February showed Boston Dynamics' new 
bipedal robot, Atlas, performing human-like tasks: opening doors, tromping about 
in the snow, lifting and stacking boxes. Tech geeks cheered and Silicon Valley 
investors salivated at the potential end to human manual labor. 
“Shortly thereafter, White House economists released a forecast that 
calculated more precisely whom Atlas and other forms of automation are going to 
put out of work. Most occupations that pay less than $20 an hour are likely to 
be, in the words of the report, “automated into obsolescence.” 
At present, many in particular jobs claim they’re irreplaceable, such as: Bus 
drivers. Bartenders. Financial advisors. Speechwriters. Firefighters. Umpires. 
Even doctors and surgeons. However, it seems corporations and investors 
apparently don’t agree with them, because they’re presently “spending billions — at least 
$8.5 billion last year on AI, and $1.8 billion on robots — toward making all 
those jobs replaceable. Why? Simply put, robots and computers don't need 
healthcare, pensions, vacation days or even salaries. 
“Powerhouse consultancies like McKinsey & Co. forecast that 45% of 
today's workplace activities could be done by robots, AI or some other already 
demonstrated technology. Some professors argue that we could see 50% 
unemployment in 30 years.” 
Two readers, offered some additional thought. One’s amusing. One’s not. 
jackbubbarg commented, “Being retired I now have to worry about them 
developing a couch potato robot. 
RogerMKE added: “The situation described by the author has 
historical precedent. In ancient Rome, for example, there were massive numbers 
of slaves who performed much of the work. As a consequence, the unemployment 
rate was quite high.”
And then, another article presented some very real confirmation about what to 
expect in automation quite soon. Kelly-Ann Mills @mirror.co.uk/tech 
writes: “[S]ix-wheeled robots could be arriving at your door soon as deliveries 
start across London. 
“The self-driving machine is packed with nine cameras, GPS and is monitored 
by real people who can immediately step in and take remote control. 
“They can carry two full grocery bags and will be with you in 30 minutes or 
less, and with delivery costing under a £1, this could be a real winner. 
Launched by Starship Technologies, a company set up by the co-founders of 
Skype, they have been riding around parts of Greenwich as part of a trial.” 
So, today’s two examples present irrefutable evidence of what happens when 
government exceeds it’s bounds in the free marketplace. And in both cases, the 
very one’s politicians are seeking to help, the unskilled, unemployed and 
indigent, are those harmed the most. And that’s because, as has been proven over and over again through time, most of those elected to office haven’t the skills, 
intellect or capabilities to help anybody do anything except themselves at the polls.
Along the same lines, here’s another thought from Ronald Reagan, 
sent by a friend: “It has been said that politics is the second oldest 
profession. 
I have learned that it bears a striking resemblance to the first.” 
Bringing us to today’s update on Bill Clinton’s wife. 
Hannah Hartig, John Lapinski and Stephanie Psyllos @nbcnews.com, report: 
“After suffering significant losses to Bernie Sanders last weekend in the 
Washington, Alaska, and Hawaii Democratic caucuses, Hillary Clinton finds 
herself in a closer race than she perhaps expected after rolling to a series of 
wins earlier this month. 
Although Bill’s wife still maintains a very large lead in the delegate 
contest, national support in the most recent “NBC News/SurveyMonkey Weekly 
Election Tracking Poll shows a race that has dipped to only a 6-point difference 
between the candidates among registered Democrats and Democratic-leaners. This 
is the smallest gap since the beginning of the tracking poll in late December.” 
Nationally, Bill’s wife's “support now stands at 49 percent down from 53 
percent last week. Sanders support is at 43 percent up slightly from 41 percent 
last week” 
And although it’s been mentioned here quite often before, an age old quote 
still applies to Bill’s lesser half: “Familiarity breeds contempt.” For those 
interested in a dictionary definition of the thought: “The more acquainted one 
becomes with a person, the more one knows about his or her shortcomings and, 
hence, the easier it is to dislike that person.” 
And in this case, another quote applies, about how dislike always grows 
toward her over time: “Ain’t that the truth.” 
Raising the ongoing question again: “Joe Biden, Mayor Bloomberg, Jerry Brown, 
and Starbuck’s chairman and CEO, Howard Schultz, are you guys reading this?  
That’s it for today folks.  
Adios
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment