Super Tuesday now over, major media’s in the throes of anointing Trump
as the Republican presidential candidate. The numbers, however, present a
significantly different picture.
On a state-by-state- basis, Trump had no major wins, with his highest margin
occurring in Massachusetts where he got 49% of the vote. His combined
competitors, though, got 51% in that state.
In Alabama Trump got 43% of the vote, the other four 57%. Alaska was won
by Cruz, Trump getting 34% of the tally, while the rest of the field gained 66%. And
the list goes on. Arkansas Trump 33%, the rest 66%, Georgia, Trump 39% the rest
61%. Minnesota was won by Rubio with Trump’s count only 21% and the others, 79%.
Cruz won Oklahoma with Trump at 28% and the field wining 72%. Tennessee, Trump
39%, the rest 61%, In Texas Cruz wins again, with Trump at 27% and the others at
73%, Vermont, Trump 33%, others 67% and Virginia, Trump 35% and the rest a
significant 65%.
Across all 12 states, he won about 36 percent of the vote, which is where he
was in New Hampshire — and 10 points below the Nevada caucuses he won last
week.
So, if these results are some kind of huge victory for Trump, either
there's some other method of gauging voter’s wishes used by the media or someone
will have to explain what I’m missing. Because the only thing that the results
clearly indicate is, most voters (64% yesterday) don’t want Trump and there are
too many other candidates still in the race.
Even the delegate count was no great landslide endorsement by any means
either. Trump gained 285, while the rest of the field amassed 281. A virtual
tie.
As far as the media’s concerned, the bias in the press was clearly expressed
by Amie Parnes @thehill.com, who wrote about Bill Clinton’s wife, as
follows:
“Many Republicans, at least, think she could destroy Trump.
“If it’s a Clinton-Trump campaign, she’s going to win and win handily,” said
Tony Fratto, who served as a spokesman to former President George W. Bush. “She
needs to come out swinging and aggressive. She needs to get out quickly and
define him, attacking him early and often and never letting up.”
And then Ms Hill wrote one of the most revealing paragraphs seen in a very
long time: ”With Trump and Clinton both largely unfavorable among voters,
Republican strategist Kevin Madden, who served as an adviser on the Romney
campaign in 2012, quipped that the campaign could be “a race to the bottom to
see who hits the bottom first.”
So, that’s where the nation is today. Two unpopular weasels vying for the
most important job on the planet, affecting the lives of hundreds of millions of
people. And a major media supporting both. One reason being that they feel certain that he
can’t win, and another because the ideology of the left doesn’t care who
represents them, so long as their every need is taken care of by government. And
their best bet at this point is a candidate whose only achievement in life is
marrying a former POTUS.
In
another display of media bias, an article by Tom Dart in Laredo, Texas @theguardian.com, is
headlined: “Trump dominates in Texas border town
where proposed wall would be built”
The text says: “A candidate who has described Mexicans as rapists and
criminals and whose core immigration plan is to make Mexico pay for a giant wall
ought not to prosper on the southern border. Yet Donald Trump was embraced on
Tuesday by voters in America’s most Hispanic city.
“Trump won almost 35% of the Republican primary vote in Webb County, where
Laredo is the county seat, comfortably ahead of Marco Rubio (28.4%) and Ted Cruz
(28.2%), the Hispanic senator from Texas who finished first in the state
overall.”
So here again, a misleading premise is foisted on the public. Especially
those who glance only at headlines. Because, not only isn’t 35% of the count
“dominating,” it isn’t even impressive. And, as shown above regarding the other
races, the same statistical problem for other candidates repeats itself. Because
with Cruz at 28.4% and Rubio at 28.2 , together they’ve attained 56.6%. Far and
away surpassing Trump again.
The summation of the anointment of Trump in the media is remindful of a
similar occurrence, taking place 68 years ago, as posted in
Wikipedia.
"Dewey Defeats Truman" was an incorrect banner headline on the front page of
the Chicago Daily Tribune on November 3, 1948, the day after incumbent
United States President Harry S. Truman won an upset victory over Republican
challenger and Governor of New York Thomas E. Dewey in the 1948 presidential
election. It was famously held up by Truman at a public appearance following his
successful election, smiling triumphantly at the error.”
Which is a reminder that it’s always wise to wait until all the
votes are in before declaring a winner. No matter how much you want to support
your favorite.
Bringing us to today’s update on Bill Clinton’s wife.
When all is said and done, aside from primary election results, the most
important vote regarding Bill’s wife rests with FBI Director James Comey. According to Harper Neidig @thehill.com, the director “told Congress on Tuesday
that he is closely involved in the agency's investigation into Hillary Clinton's
use of a private email server while she was secretary of State.”
Representative Steve Chabot (R-Ohio) said, "This is a matter of considerable
import. Is there anything that you can tell us as to when this matter might be
wrapped up one way or the other?”
"I can't, congressman, as you know we don't talk about our investigations,"
Comey responded. "What I can assure you is that I am very close personally to
that investigation to ensure that we have the resources we need, including
people and technology, and that it's done the way the FBI tries to do all of
it's work: independently, competently and promptly. That's our goal, and I'm
confident that it's being done that way, but I can't give you any more details
beyond that."
Therefore, with the investigation still going on, it’s anyone’s bet as to
what the outcome will be. Although rumors abound that should the White House
attempt to suppress an indictment of Bill’s wife, Comey and others are prepared
to resign from the bureau. And if that happens, it will surely set off a huge,
damaging controversy in Congress.
Bringing up the ongoing question: Joe Biden, Mayor Bloomberg, Jerry Brown,
and Starbuck’s chairman and CEO, Howard Schultz, are you guys reading this?
That’s it for today folks.
Adios
No comments:
Post a Comment