Yesterday’s entry regarded an article @latimes.com via
Drudge that morning that “illustrated the
horrid results encountered when clearly unqualified critics take on subjects far
beyond their comprehension capabilities.”
Setting their premise the article's authors wrote: “After 10 weeks of pinballing
through political and domestic fiascos largely of his own making, President
Trump last week faced the kinds of wrenching external challenges no White House
occupant can avoid for long.
“This was the week a reality-TV presidency faced cold reality.”
Realities mentioned included the Syrian crisis and escalating U.S. concerns
about North Korea’s ballistic missile tests and nuclear capability, “even as
Trump held back-to-back summits with three visiting foreign leaders, including
China's president.”
Then, throughout the article numerous examples were provided in each of which
Trump was cast in extremely negative light. Yet, in most of what the authors
presented, negativity arose simply because the authors had neither the
experience, appropriate education or intellectual capability to grasp Trump's
problem-solving acumen, methodology, operating style or negotiation
technique.
And now, today, additional items in the news underscore that not only are
typical leftist journalists out of touch with real world practicalities, but
have no understanding of pragmatic leadership whatsoever. Because additional
forward strides have been taken once more by the new POTUS, as evidenced in the
following items.
According to Sean Moran @breitbart.com: “President Donald Trump’s
campaign promises already have convinced drug companies to lower prices and
increase transparency.
In January, Trump put the pharmaceutical industry on notice, explaining drug
prices were too high and that drug companies were “getting away with murder.”
Trump added, “PhRMA has a lot of lobbies, a lot of lobbyists, a lot of power.
And there’s very little bidding on drugs. We’re the largest buyer of drugs in
the world, and yet we don’t bid properly. We’re going to start bidding. We’re
going to save billions of dollars over a period of time.”
As a result, since election day several large drug companies offered to lower
the annual increase of prices. “Novo Nordisk President Jakob Riis promised to
limit the annual increase in drug prices. Riis explained, “We hear from more and
more people living with diabetes about the challenges they face affording
healthcare, including the medicines we make. We take this issue seriously and
have been thinking about what we can do to better support patients,” Riis said.
“This has become a responsibility that needs to be shared among all those
involved in healthcare and we’re going to do our part.”
“Novo Nordisk followed the leadership of Brent Saunders, chief executive of
Allergan, who issued a “social contract,” promising to limit the annual increase
of the price of pharmaceuticals.
“Merck, Johnson & Johnson, and Lilly unveiled plans to increase their
transparency regarding their drug pricing.”
Pledging to lower the price of drugs by easing regulations from the Food and
Drug Administration, which would make it easier to get drugs approved. Trump
stated, “We’re also going to be streamlining the process, so that, from your
standpoint, when you have a drug, you can actually get it approved if it works,
instead of waiting for many, many years.”
Robert Hugin of Celgene argued that the changes encouraged by President Trump
stand to benefit every American. Hugin said,
“The changes he is proposing are ones that I think are going to be great for the
country and consumers.”
All of which adds up to another promise fulfillment for the new POTUS.
Next comes the recent thoughts of Ralph Peters, retired United States Army
lieutenant colonel best known in the media for his appearances on Fox News, who
previously stated that “Barack Obama’s "preemptive retreat" was the reason for
an ongoing “blood bath” in Iraq, Syria, Egypt, and Libya”
Then, according to Wikipedia, “when commenting on the ongoing U.S. diplomacy
with Cuba, Iran, and Russia, Ralph Peters stated that President Obama has been
“date raped.” He added that soft questioning that NPR posed to President Obama
regarding foreign relations was “what you need to know about the state of NPR.”
And now, today, Colonel Peters wrote @nypost.com: “The United States
is back. There are, indeed, red lines. And the enemies of humanity cross those
lines at their peril.
“Nor was the lesson lost on President Xi Jinping of China, who, with perfect
timing, is our president’s guest at Mar-a-Largo.
“The coming days will see no end of partisan second-guessing, hand-wringing
and, yes, actual repercussions. But President Trump did the right thing. Relying
on the strong backbones of Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis, National Security
Advisor H.R. McMaster and, not least, our men and women in uniform, the
president knocked it out of the park on his first time at bat in the
foreign-policy big leagues.
“As I write these lines, I’m unabashedly proud to be an American. Republican,
Democrat or independent, you should be, too. Once again, we stood on the side of
justice and humanity.
“It’s been too damned long, but we’re back.”
However, if the Colonel is already “unabashedly proud to be an American,” it
would be hard to guess at what his feelings will become when learning about new
military developments as reported by Ben Kew @breitbart.com today.
“The Trump administration is reportedly considering positioning nuclear
weapons in South Korea in an attempt to fend off rising hostility from the North
Korean regime.
“According to NBC News, the National Security Council has presented Donald
Trump and his advisers with a range of options to counteract the North Korean
threat, among them positioning nuclear weapons in South Korea or assassinating
the country’s dictator Kim Jong-un.
“The possibility of this kind of action seems to fit
“Secretary of Defense James Mattis has previously warned that any attack from
North Korea on the United States would lead to a retaliation that is both
“effective and overwhelming.”
Which means that military experts finally have a Commander-in-Chief they not
only respect, but also can rely on.
Bringing us to another subject, which also reflects the change in attitude at
the nation’s top and the positive results gained from that.
Jenny Jarvie reports from the same latimes.com that continues
finding fault with Trump, that: “Across the Southwest border, the number of
immigrants caught crossing illegally into the United States has dropped
dramatically. Fewer than 12,200 people were apprehended in March, a 64% decrease
from the same time last year, and the lowest monthly number in at least 17
years.
Marlene Castro, a supervisory Border Patrol agent, who has worked for Customs
and Border Protection for nearly 20 years, said: “We don’t really have a normal
anymore.” She insists agents are not doing anything differently; the Trump
administration’s executive orders are simply enforcing laws already on the
books.
“Are you going to risk a 1,000-mile journey and pay $8,000 to be smuggled if
you’re not sure you’ll get to stay?” Castro said, offering a reason she thinks
fewer asylum seekers are crossing over. “I wouldn’t.”
And thus it seems, by presenting his unequivocal hard stance against illegal
entry, he’s given himself considerably more time to raise the funds required for
his wall. It’s also quite possible that if he keeps insisting that border agents
do their jobs as intended, a wall might not be needed at all.
That's it for today folks.
Adios
No comments:
Post a Comment