Regardless of what delving into specific statistical outcomes may eventually
disclose, last night’s debate proved hugely successful for Trump. Because, as
reported by James S. Robbins @usatoday.com this morning: “Trump pulled
off presidential”
Mr. Robbins writes: “Like Reagan in 1980, viewers saw a Trump who was better
than the liberal talking points.
“You can’t fact check leadership, and tonight Donald Trump showed himself a
leader.”
A comparison was then made to none other than to the revered Ronald Reagan.
“Overall, [Jimmy] Carter kept Reagan on the defensive, and the president
probably won on points. However, Reagan’s affability and easy manner wore well
against Carter’s stern lecturing. Reagan did not come off as the cartoonish,
conservative cowboy of Democratic talking points. The Lowell Sun
observed, “Ronald Reagan had not self-destructed. He had not made any
ill-advised statements that were clearly foolish, as Carter had hoped. Reagan
appeared calm under Carter’s attack. With his polished stage manner, he went a
long way in presenting himself as presidential timber.” Many Americans agreed. A
Gallup poll two days before the debate showed Reagan trailing Carter 39% to 47%.
A week later, Reagan won the election 51% to 41%.
“The same words could apply to 2016. Donald Trump did not self-destruct, he
did not make foolish statements (whether you agree with him or not), he gave as
well as he got. And despite Clinton’s numerous mocking remarks to the contrary,
he came off as presidential. And that’s a fact.”
As far as the numbers themselves are concerned, polling data for last night’s
contest is in and the results are debatable.
According to dailymail.co.uk: “CNN awarded Hillary Clinton an
overwhelming victory in the first presidential debate - but most snap polls show
Trump emerged victorious.
“Online polls carried out afterwards gave a different outcome - handing the
title to Trump.
“Such polls are self-selecting, and more likely to pick up the views of those
who vote, although CNN's study also reflected a similar bias.
“The Drudge Report's poll showed Trump fared better with 81.5 per cent of the
vote to Clinton's 18.5 while others, including Time, CBS New York and the
Washington Times, also saw Trump win the vote.”
FoxNews.com’s Charles Krauthammer arrived at a similar conclusion
regarding both candidate’s performance, but gave the edge to Trump.
“It was not exactly the knock out fight that we thought. It was a spirited
fight. I think in the end it was something like a draw. But I do believe that
the draw goes to the challenger in the sense that Trump did not go over the
line. And the very fact he could go 90 minutes on the same stage ultimately
elevates the challenger, that's just automatic for any debate of that sort.”
Which on an otherwise slow news day, brings us to the update on Bill
Clinton’s wife.
David Lightman and Tim Funk @charlotteobserver.com, addressed
results from a focus group of voters from around Charlotte conducted by
McClatchy and the Charlotte Observer, as follows:
“Indeed, while polls said that Clinton won the first general election debate
with Donald Trump Monday, she may not have won actual votes. And she may even
have lost some, at least in the battleground state of North Carolina.
“The closeness of the race – even after a seeming Clinton win in the debate –
was underscored in the hour-long discussion with voters after watching the
debate at Queens University of Charlotte.
“Kae Roberts and Jay Eardly were leaning toward Hillary Clinton before Monday
night’s debate.
“By the end, they had both pulled away.
“John Kokos and Hank Federal were undecided going in, potential Clinton
backers.
“By the end, they’d ruled her out.
And most important about the voter’s change of heart, are the reasons why.
“For the four who emerged less impressed by Clinton, it was the seeming
familiarity of her proposals for the economy and national security that was a
turnoff.
“Roberts, who is unaffiliated with a party, wrote in her notes several times
during the debate that Clinton offered “pie in the sky” ideas. By debate’s end,
she had moved from leaning toward Clinton to undecided.”
All of which underlines that regardless of her debating skills, years in
politics and government, voters today want answers to their
administration-caused dilemmas. And she’s not only not the solution, she’s a
major part of the problem.
Bringing up the ongoing question once more: Bernie Sanders, Joe Biden, Jerry
Brown, and Starbucks chairman and CEO, Howard Schultz; are you guys reading
this?
That's it for today folks.
Adios
No comments:
Post a Comment