BloggeRhythms

Thoughts of posting about tonight’s presidential debate arise often as hype and promotion of the event continually overflow across all media. They've been avoided to date while no plan exists to view the event either. Although sufficient justification for ignoring the time waste likely requires far more too much text than readers would find tolerable, a condensed version of underlying reasoning follows anyway.

A beginning supposition, taken from innumerable examples, addresses immigration. Supposing Trump was a blithering idiot, unable to articulate precisely while presenting a totally unkempt persona. Biden conversely delivered perfect personal imagery as if possessing incredible intellect along with haberdashery worthy of Gentleman’s Quarterly covers while making his case in verbal perfection. Trump’s platform, though, included a secure border, protecting national assets, treasure and the entire population from dangers arising from unbridled entry by unidentified aliens. Biden conversely offered unquestioned passage to any and all choosing to do so. For all those wishing to keep the nation and its people secure, regardless of a candidate’s personal appearance or articulation capabilities, what is there to debate about?

Moving on to the economy, if raising taxes will quickly strangle the nation’s phenomenal growth exhibited over the past three and a half years under Trump, what is there to debate about?

For those believing in all unborn’s right to life, regardless of any candidate’s appearance, presentation skills or accumulated knowledge, what is there to debate about?

As the list continues, there’s the issue of asset redistribution as fostered by an irrational Sanders and the lunatic Cortez woman. For those believing in entitlement to what they themselves have earned, what is there to debate about?

How about the police? For those preferring not to live in sanctuary’s where criminality, homelessness, personal vulnerability and lawlessness are promoted by government while law and order meet total ignorance, what is there to debate about?

In the case of keeping one’s own health insurance plans and options open as more than 80% of the population does now, as opposed to complete government control in the future, what is there to debate about?

During the past three and a half years its been proven that the nation has risen to the point that it can be self-sufficient energy-wise forever, remaining environmentally pristine at the same time. For those preferring not to return to victimhood by oil producing Middle-Eastern or South American nations economically or otherwise, what is there to debate about?

Then there’s the whole climate change hoax where the Paris Accord would be rejoined potentially costing the U.S. economy $3 trillion and 6.5 million industrial sector jobs by 2040, according to a comprehensive new study prepared by NERA Economic Consulting. Considering that none of the issues presented by climate activists exist nor have ever been proven at all, what is there to debate about?

Believing at this juncture the debate point’s been made regarding the nonsensical leftist substantive issues, that leaves the personal presentation aspects of the event for consideration. And after watching Trump deliver hours of solid, intelligent and outright pleasurable entertainment at his rally’s, even that cannot override having to observe the likely tortuous babblings of a worn-out, probably senile political hack whose greatest accomplishment remains family enrichment through abuse of former public offices held. So, once again, what is there to debate about?

That’s it for today folks.

Adios