BloggeRhythms

Didn’t watch Bill O’Reilly interview the incumbent last night whereas, having no interest in either party, didn’t want to waste the time. From the recaps I read this morning, the decision was the right one to make.

 

O’Reilly, it seems, asked a lot of obvious questions to which he got no truthful answers and more or less confirmed Rush’s definition of him several years ago, referring to him as Ted Baxter.

 

Ordinarily, I wouldn’t have mentioned the subject at all. However, I brought it up because I came across an Item on Fox News on-line that pretty much sums the interview up.

 

When Baxter asked about people keeping satisfactory plans under his health care tax, the incumbent replied: “This is one that I regret and I've said I regretted, in part because we put in a grandfather clause in the original law saying that, in fact, you were supposed to be able to keep it.  It obviously didn’t cover everybody that we needed to and that's why we changed it, so that we further grandfathered in folks and many people who thought originally, when they got that cancellation notice, they couldn't keep it or not.”

 

Now, after rereading the preceding quite a few times, I’ve concluded I simply don’t understand the answer at all because it isn’t even double-talk, its gibberish. In fact, the last sentence is totally incomprehensible. And sadly for me, though I vowed not to waste my time on these two guys, as you can see, I just did.

 

Then somebody must have told Willy’s wife that there are problems in the Middle-East, a place she knew nothing about during her term as Secretary of State, because also according to Fox:

 

“In a letter to Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton it made clear that she supports the administration’s deal to allow Iran to have a nuclear program in exchange for safeguards that it will not be used to make weapons. She encouraged her former Senate colleagues to drop a bid to restore tougher sanctions: “We should give anyone watching from Tehran no reason to doubt America’s unity and resolve.”

 

So, after the Benghazi charade and cover-up, in her next comment on foreign affairs she’s choosing to give freedom to Iran to continue their nuclear weapon program, positioning themselves to dominate the region, and perhaps, other parts of the world. 

 

And in case she’s wondering why so many people are against the idea of reducing sanctions on Iran’s nuclear progress, perhaps its because they’re bragging about how they’ve duped the U.S. and intend to keep on building toward a nuclear arsenal. But, to find that out, she’d actually have to get involved in the situation herself and learn the facts, which just isn’t her style.

 

That’s it for today folks.

 

Adios