Saturday, January 28, 2012

BloggeRhythms 1/28/2012

I find the extent that double-standards can be taken to in politics is astounding. Because the anti-war policies of the current administration seem to be falling by the wayside as the U.S. Navy's  now working to place a 'mothership' for Special Operations Forces in the Middle East, as confirmed by Fox News.

The USS Ponce, scheduled to be decommissioned in December, will now be transformed into a flotilla for use by Navy SEALs which, I believe, can only be confirmation that a military intervention or war's now expected regarding Iran and its nuclear weapons buildup.

And this issue got me to remembering a list I saw posted on the Internet about eight years ago, comparing decisions made by George W. Bush and Bill Clinton as far as the U.S. press was concerned. 

Clinton awards Halliburton no-bid contract in Yugoslavia - good
Bush awards Halliburton no-bid contract in Iraq - bad


Clinton spends $77 billion on war in Serbia - good
Bush spends $87 billion in Iraq - bad


Clinton imposes regime change in Serbia - good
Bush imposes regime change in Iraq - bad


Clinton bombs Christian Serbs on behalf of Muslim Albanian terrorists - good
Bush liberates 25 million from a genocidal dictator - bad


Clinton bombs Chinese Embassy - good
Bush bombs terrorist camps - bad


Clinton commits felonies while in office - good
Bush lands on aircraft carrier in flight suit - bad


No mass graves found in Serbia - good
No WMD found in Iraq - bad


Stock market crashes in 2000 under Clinton - good
Economy on upswing under Bush - bad


Clinton refuses to take custody of bin Laden - good
World Trade Centers fall under Bush - bad


Clinton says Saddam has nukes - good
Bush says Saddam has nukes - bad


Clinton calls for regime change in Iraq - good
Bush imposes regime change in Iraq - bad


Terrorist training in Afghanistan under Clinton - good
Bush destroys training camps in Afghanistan - bad


Milosevic not yet convicted - good
Saddam turned over for trial - bad


So, I guess what we have here is the same old, same old. Because the actual effect of decisions doesn't seem to really matter where politics in the press is concerned. All that counts for them is the promotion of a biased agenda, with no regard whatsoever as to what's good for the world.

That's it for today folks.

Adios

No comments:

Post a Comment