Thursday, October 23, 2014

BloggeRhythms

Confirming data posted here over the past four years, a major figure in climatology has now taken a very firm stand against the fictions proclaimed by global warming zealots, as follows: 
 
Jason Taylor of www.express.co.uk, writes about John Coleman, co-founder of the Weather Channel, who “shocked academics by insisting the theory of man-made climate change was no longer scientifically credible.” He further stated that, “what 'little evidence' there is for rising global temperatures points to a 'natural phenomenon' within a developing eco-system.”
 
In an open letter attacking the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Mr. Coleman wrote: "The ocean is not rising significantly. The polar ice is increasing, not melting away. Polar Bears are increasing in number. Heat waves have actually diminished, not increased. There is not an uptick in the number or strength of storms (in fact storms are diminishing.)”
 
He claimed that, “I have studied this topic seriously for years. It has become a political and environment agenda item, but the science is not valid." And, “he based many of his views on the findings of the NIPCC, a non-governmental international body of scientists aimed at offering an 'independent second opinion of the evidence reviewed by the IPCC.'
 
In conclusion, he added: "There is no significant man-made global warming at this time, there has been none in the past and there is no reason to fear any in the future. Efforts to prove the theory that carbon dioxide is a significant greenhouse gas and pollutant causing significant warming or weather effects have failed. There has been no warming over 18 years." 
 
Additionally, climate expert William Happer, from Princeton University, supported Mr Coleman's claims, saying, "No chemical compound in the atmosphere has a worse reputation than CO2, thanks to the single-minded demonization of this natural and essential atmospheric gas by advocates of government control and energy production.
 
The incredible list of supposed horrors that increasing carbon dioxide will bring the world is pure belief disguised as science."
 
What’s more, “In 2010 a high-level inquiry by the InterAcademy Council found there was "little evidence" to support the IPCC's claims about global warming. It also said the panel had purposely emphasized the negative impacts of climate change and made "substantive findings" based on little proof.”
 
So, as usual for political frauds who employ questionable tactics to stimulate their voting base, such as the current administration, they may generate significant support from their efforts at selling fables. Yet, there are other kinds of backing they severely lack, such as real credibility developed from documentable facts and historical evidence.
 
That’s it for today folks.
 
Adios

No comments:

Post a Comment