Monday, November 25, 2013

BloggeRhythms

There seems to be significant backlash regarding the incumbent’s desire to allow Iran to continue building nuclear weapon capability. And naturally, one of the most vehemently opposed to that happening is Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, who delivered a tirade on Sunday, calling the agreement to ease sanctions on Iran a “historic mistake.”
 
Realizing the negative consequences, should Netanyahu continue his criticism, the incumbent called him yesterday, seeking to allay Israeli anxieties over the deal.
 
Now, considering the formerly close ties between the two nations, and the support  of all types Israel still receives from the U.S., the prime minister doesn’t seem to have many options other than listening as politely as possible and indicating intention to acquiesce.
 
On the other hand, however, imagine what must be going through Mr. Netanyahu’s mind. Because he certainly has to consider what the incumbent’s promises of any kind are worth, which to date include the keystones to health care reform: customers keeping doctor’s they’re happy with along with lower costs.
 
Then there’s the raid on Benghazi, which wasn’t a terrorist attack. The auto bail-outs that helped the U.S. economy; climate change concerns causing continued importation of foreign oil; employing the IRS as a political policy-enforcement tool; abandoning Iraq while losing control of Afghanistan and turning Middle-Eastern influence over to Vladimir Putin.
 
Therefore, considering the preceding partial list of presidential fabrications to date, all of them clearly demonstrating the incumbent’s continual reliance on untruths to better or protect himself, Mr. Netanyahu’s probably meeting with his leaders right now to make sure Israel's own military capability is functioning properly. Because with the “friend” Israel has in the White House right now, it's soon going to have to defeat a nuclear-armed Iran all by itself.
 
Making a different point about the same region, Fox News Security Analyst , K.T. McFarland: “considers the potential for a Middle Eastern arms race for Fox News Opinion: If we were independent of Middle East energy we would not be drawn into the internecine wars that have plagued the region for millennia. And, if the region is headed for a nuclear arms race, the last place we want to be is in the middle of it, still dependent on Arab oil.”
 
And then we come to a further example of how Dem’s change, or completely ignore, facts to suit them.
 
Fox's Chris Stirewalt reports the following: “The reality is, any big thing you take on, any big change, is hard to accomplish,’ said David Axelrod, the president’s longtime strategist. In America, he said, ‘we’ve created a sense that everyone can expect to win — nobody has to sacrifice.’ At the same time, Mr. Axelrod argued that widening income inequality has, to some Americans at least, changed the meaning of redistribution. ‘The whole redistribution argument has shifted in the country because there’s a sense that a lot of redistribution has been to the top and not the bottom,’ Mr. Axelrod said.”
 
So, here we have a top presidential compatriot totally ignoring the core of what’s transpired for the past five years in the nation. However, while the numbers refuting his argument about redistribution speak for themselves but are far to complex to dissect here, his upside down view of “sacrifice” can easily be disputed. Because under this administration, everyone has sacrificed somehow regardless, except those at the very top of leftist politics, which is how socialism has always worked throughout world history.
 
That’s it for today folks.
 
Adios

No comments:

Post a Comment